Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trane250

Not if you saw the valley where they’re putting it in person, or the perfectly good, productive ranches they’re going to dry up to get the 24,000 acre-feet of underground water for their cooling.

Given that all these coal-fired projects are planning on selling their power to (ultimately) California, I say build them in California. Why should Nevadans have to suffer reduced air quality, diversion of precious water resources and see increased transmission lines across our landscapes to allow the idiots in California to light their McMansions?


39 posted on 07/27/2007 12:17:40 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: NVDave

Good point. If the ultimate destination for the power is California, Californians should not be exporting the environmental effects of their lifestyle and immigration policy.


41 posted on 07/27/2007 3:58:34 AM PDT by listenhillary (¿Qué parter DE "illegal" ousted no entente?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson