To: TChris
I believe there is something to be concerned about, and I believe the principles of the Constitution clearly allow for regulating the behavior of others when it affects someone else. Not every issue demands government response, but I believe this one might. It's a legal product.
It's like saying SUV's need to be regulated for IF an SUV goes head on with a Yugo in an accident the occupants of the Yugo don't stand a chance.
Only when we all drone to lockstep agenda and lose all individual freedom will the the arguments end.
The arguments end won't come for it's human nature to be individual as long as there is two humans or more on the face of the earth.
169 posted on
07/24/2007 1:16:28 PM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: EGPWS
It's like saying SUV's need to be regulated for IF an SUV goes head on with a Yugo in an accident the occupants of the Yugo don't stand a chance. No, it's not like that at all. Your SUV doesn't have a good chance of harming me simply by being near it. There seems to be a likelihood that smoking does.
...and smoking isn't an accident.
171 posted on
07/24/2007 1:22:17 PM PDT by
TChris
(The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson