Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale

If the shale oil process produces at $20, then it is profitable as long as oil on the open market is above that.

That may make it a lower-profit supply, but profitable nonetheless. Government guarantees to purchase 2 billion barrels a year from shale for the next 20 years at $30 barrel would be a good use of government money from an energy security perspective.

If market prices stayed above $30, it wouldn’t cost the government a dime because the producers would sell on the open market rather than take the government’s $30. But domestic production would be guaranteed a profit in case OPEC tried to manipulate market prices for pumped crude lower to squeeze them out. It would effectively eliminate the risk to capital investment that developing the shale oil will require.


42 posted on 07/23/2007 4:22:07 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (Liberals aren't atheists. They worship government -- including human sacrifices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Kellis91789

Gov’t subsidy won’t work that way. Besides that, nobody would build that much plant for zero profit when there is oil to be pumped at decent profit.


44 posted on 07/23/2007 4:26:17 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson