Posted on 07/23/2007 10:48:39 AM PDT by AuntB
It's easy to spot those like you that are less than truthful and genuine in their responses.
Patton teaches that history is prologue and we can only affect the here and now.
Who is now in charge of the dismal situation is gonna catch the all the crap for the present dismal situation. i.e Patton didn’t whine about the outcome of WWI, that gave rise to the nazi’s while rolling a 3rd Army tank column through the Whermacht like crap through a goose on the way to Germany.
I didn’t say you were a liberal. I said your reaction was liberal.
You are disingenuous.
There fixed it so that it was a truthful and genuine response.
Disingenuous: lacking in candor
I've been very candid, and you are very thick not to realize that.
No, you've been willfully ignorant.
You think that Bush's worse sin on immigration is one of inaction. That the only thing he's done wrong is to not reverse the policies of his predecessors, meanwhile ignoring what he has actually done.
I'd really like to know what you think of the Partnership for Prosperity agreement, New Alliance Task Force and Social Security Totalization Agreement with Mexico. Bush has taken these actions during his administration. Do you support Bush for what he actually has done?
Even your definition is disingenuous.
dis÷in÷gen÷u÷ous
/ˌdɪs
ɪnˈdʒɛn
yu
əs/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[dis-in-jen-yoo-uh
s] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
lacking in frankness, candor, or sincerity; falsely or hypocritically ingenuous; insincere: Her excuse was rather disingenuous. dis·in·gen·u·ous
|
LOL! That's why I will chose to avoid dialog with this individual in the future.
My you are thick. I got that defintion from Merriam Webster on line.
Goodness, you really are thick.
I'll make this really easy for you.
Partnership for Prosperity agreement. Good or bad?
New Alliance Task Force. Good or bad?
Social Security Totalization Agreement with Mexico. Good or bad?
It's pretty clear on which side of the debate he stands, isn't it?
Yes.
Even your defense of your definition is disingenuous:
From Merriam Webster Online:
Main Entry: dis·in·gen·u·ous
Pronunciation: "dis-in-'jen-y&-w&s, -yü-&s-
Function: adjective
: lacking in candor; also : giving a false appearance of simple frankness : CALCULATING
- dis·in·gen·u·ous·ly adverb
- dis·in·gen·u·ous·ness noun
There it is, honey - the definition “lacking in candor.” My goodness you are thick.
All bad. Does this mean you’ll finally stop asking the same question you’ve already asked (and received an answer to)?
And where is the candor about the following:
Partnership for Prosperity agreement. Good or bad?
New Alliance Task Force. Good or bad?
Social Security Totalization Agreement with Mexico. Good or bad?
Or, is this the part where you call me thick?
Why are they all bad?
Please point out your post where you wrote these were all bad.
Because they only serve to make a bad situation worse.
Let me ask you (although I'm sure you won't answer the question), was Reagan's grant of amnesty good or bad?
Please point out your post where you wrote these were all bad.
Good grief, you are so thick! I was refering to the question you had previously asked numerous times, sometimes multiple times in the same post. I would have thought you were intelligent enough to know that since I've already mentioned it. Get a grip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.