Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kidd; cva66snipe
1. The discussion revolves around a LOAN, not a gift. I’m not entirely familiar with the finances, but I do believe that it mainly serves as a vehicle to make payments from the communists to an American firm.

Actually, as the article notes, it's a Japanese-owned firm.

So, basically, we're subsidizing the transfer of nuclear technology to China, so that the same Japanese Company which sold our submarine-propulsion technology to Soviet Russia can make big profits.

Brilliant.

59 posted on 07/22/2007 3:15:59 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Westinghouse is essentially an autonomous division of Toshiba. The payments will be made directly to Westinghouse, as is the case for all business that Westinghouse is involved in.

The deal with the Chinese was significantly completed BEFORE the Japanese bought Westinghouse from BNFL (a British company). This deal was initiated when Westinghouse was a division of a BRITISH company.


67 posted on 07/22/2007 3:26:50 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
So, basically, we're subsidizing the transfer of nuclear technology to China, so that the same Japanese Company which sold our submarine-propulsion technology to Soviet Russia can make big profits.

That's about the size of it. Justification of policy against the United States because another country will do it if we don't. The justifications for Bush's sellout reach an all time low.

The fact that the Pentagon reviewed this means nothing anymore. The ones who actually put America first over politics were booted out under Poppy and Clinton's terms. What remains is Yes Men till even some of them no longer have the stomach for it or their conscience gets to them.

I hope in my lifetime and even my grandkids life time the family Bush never holds another federal office be it an elected or appointed one. They are indeed as bad as Bill Clinton was policy wise. Maybe more so because more rational leadership was expected out of a Republican. It's like Carter and Ford. There was no difference between them policy wise.

93 posted on 07/22/2007 3:51:36 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson