If Ron Paul were not actively working to discredit the mission of our troops in a war declared upon us by Islamic jihadists (hence “jihad” - their declaration of war) I might be able to give Paul an audience for his views. Instead I distrust and despise the man for being such an awful voice at a time when America must muster the resolve and will to win what will be a very difficult and challenging war.You are exactly right. The Paulites scrambling to find issues that put RP in a good light -- after he's stabbed our troops in the back by voting with the worst of the leftist in the House -- is a bit like trying to promote the fact that Hitler was a vegetarian and was kind to kittens and puppies.
Who gives a sh*t? So what if RP gets a few things right? I don't.
He votes with the Friends of Jihad in Congress, in 2007, in the midst of America At War. I don't care if he also spit-shines his shoes or if he gives money to orphans in Uzbekistan. That doesn't matter to me. He's a traitor to our troops, and on the side of the RAT Jihadists in congress. That trumps everything.
Give the man credit for the times he stands up against evil. Reagan was cheered when he did.
George Bush is the traitor to our troops, our nation, and our Constitution. He sent them to a war in Iraq we had no business starting, and cut back their numbers in Afghanistan.
Trying to bring American soldiers home so they don't get killed is "stab(bing) our troops in the back" and makes him "a traitor to our troops." The anti-Paulites just get nuttier and nuttier.