To: elhombrelibre
In general, not worth the discussion, his impact on anything other than earmarks for is district is zero.
14 posted on
07/22/2007 2:16:37 PM PDT by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: SJackson
I view him as a distraction who is undermining support for America and the WOT. He distracts many principled people and demoralizes others. And his association with Holocaust deniers is a moral flaw. Some people deserve to be shunned, and Ron Paul’s unwillingness to shun them puts him in that category.
17 posted on
07/22/2007 2:21:58 PM PDT by
elhombrelibre
(Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
To: SJackson
In general, not worth the discussion, his impact on anything other than earmarks for is district is zero.
Of course he forwards the earmarks to the committee as a constituent service. Then he votes against them.
In a recent story about a theater-renovation project, the project's primary tax parasite civic leader was congratulated on Ron Paul putting in the requested earmark. He replied, "I'd be happier if I thought he'd actually vote for it."
You see, his constituents know full well how he votes on these things. Yet, they keep re-electing him. By large margins.
111 posted on
07/22/2007 4:46:14 PM PDT by
George W. Bush
(Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson