[mkjessup]

I’m still a Hunter supporter, but he makes a lot of sense.

Same here, and I can think of far worse things than a Hunter/Paul ticket, or even a Paul/Hunter ticket.

MKJ <-- chuckling at the images of all those Ron Paul supporters spewing their morning coffee as they think "my GAWD, that f'in mkjessup is actually comin' around?!?!?" LOL

[traderrob6]

“I can think of far worse things than a Hunter/Paul ticket, or even a Paul/Hunter ticket.”

I can, a Hillary/Obama ticket and they would win over your team by 20 points minimum. Get real.

[George W. Bush]

MKJ <-- chuckling at the images of all those Ron Paul supporters spewing their morning coffee as they think "my GAWD, that f'in mkjessup is actually comin' around?!?!?" LOL

Not at all. Having lived through the Reagan years, we knew you'd succumb to that sweet message of liberty, conservative principles, small-government, and the Constitution.

No real conservative can resist the lure! LOL.

[AngryNeighbor]

"... a Hunter/Paul ticket, or even a Paul/Hunter ticket."

While I agree with most of Dr. Paul's positions, on spending, he and Hunter are diametrically opposed. Paul has voted no on virtually every spending bill, opposed every item of pork and opposed increasing both the size and influence of the federal government. Hunter on the other hand has been in the pocket of the big spenders in the RNC, voted for every pork project, and has taken every opportunity to support Pres. Bush's expansion of the federal bureaucracy. If past voting records are an indicator of what a candidate believes, Paul believes in limited government, while Hunter believes in big spending, increasing government power, and snuggling up to the K-street lobbyists.