Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lfrancis

I have been as harsh a critic of Ron Paul as anyone here on FR, but I have to say that based upon this statement alone, I am impressed with what he is saying.

Congressman Duncan Hunter is still my preferred candidate and will remain so, but I won’t be engaging in any more Paul-bashing.

Whether or not Paul is a viable candidate for President isn’t the issue. The principles and beliefs that he has proclaimed as his own in this statement are more than sufficient for me to take a ‘wait and see’ approach and I have to reverse myself and say that I think he should be included in every future presidential debate, and his ideas should be discussed.

And yes, I am sober.


4 posted on 07/22/2007 5:21:47 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup

heh you beat me by a minute!


6 posted on 07/22/2007 5:23:59 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

I agree and think we make a grave mistake if we just shun this guy - I too am inspired by many of his ideas and convictions. Would that any of the other politicians had is spine. At least with Paul, you know where he stands and with the exception of his position on the WOT, I find it hard to disagree with him on many things related to smaller government. I just wish it was someone else making the case.

Having said that, I too am Hunter supporter and continue to believe he has the right message for the time.


11 posted on 07/22/2007 5:29:23 AM PDT by mek1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup
Whether or not Paul is a viable candidate for President isn’t the issue. The principles and beliefs that he has proclaimed as his own in this statement are more than sufficient for me to take a ‘wait and see’ approach and I have to reverse myself and say that I think he should be included in every future presidential debate, and his ideas should be discussed.

I agree, and I tend to think that he has given more thought to his ideas than most candidates have, and I tend to think his are based more on principal than on what he thinks people want to hear.

36 posted on 07/22/2007 7:24:48 AM PDT by Amelia (Never argue with idiots - they'll bring you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup
I have to say that based upon this statement alone, I am impressed with what he is saying.

Agree.

60 posted on 07/22/2007 12:19:53 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup
Ron Paul is the best candidate for these times, in my opinion. But if he doesn't get the nomination I could vote for Hunter. I will not vote for any of the MSM anointed "top tier" socialists, however.

Neither will I vote for that guy who isn't running.;^)

81 posted on 07/22/2007 6:28:33 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson