My FRiend, I didn't mention anything about a candidate's record being of little interest--you did. Those are your words.
What I did say is that hundreds of articles, each one on a speech or a single event from 1997 or 2000, aren't drawing much interest.
I'm sure you've noted, by the way, I haven't slammed Mr. Hunter.
Never said you did slam Hunter.
And considering that a majority of the posts about Hunter are about clarifying his record, that’s the conclusion I drew.