Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
If there's no taxpayer funding and/or restrictions, what do you think women considering an abortion going to do? They're more than likely going to keep it or give it up for adoption.

And how is that different from the status quo?

391 posted on 07/19/2007 3:07:41 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker
And how is that different from the status quo?

Because Fred has always been against taxpayer-funding of abortions and supported parental notification laws.

If there are restrictions against abortions, and if the woman has to pay for them, abortions would decrease, don't you think? Now I support a human right amendment to the Constitution but such an idea had no way in Hades of passing a Rat Congress & a Rat President. The pro-life movement basically had to take what it could get.

Look, Fred dropped the ball here, he should have been open from the get-go. But that's not going to change my opinion of him. His voting record, and his subsequent statements affirming his support for life, is enough in my book.

400 posted on 07/19/2007 3:40:58 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson