Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad_as_heck

That’s exactly the same thing I heard. Also, he was asked to come up with a plan for invading Iraq in Gulf War I, and it was pure, “over the top, infantry swarming against tanks & machine guns like WWI” with tens of thousands of anticipated American casualties. He was asked if he wouldn’t mind having some other generals give it a fresh look, and Schwartzkopf came up with his plan within a matter of moments, and Powell was politely asked not to be involved in the strategic planning after that. Soon afterwards, his military career was over.


60 posted on 07/19/2007 12:46:47 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq -- via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo
Powell was an inside the beltway political general: Good at negotiating contracts for new bed pans but not interested in doing the hard and messy things that are risky and might not advance your carrier. I once thought so much of him. A real disappointment.

I think one of the real mistakes we made in this war made inevitable by the disbanding of the "big army" we still had at the time of the Gulf War. The success of the surge is showing that we needed far more boots on the ground to clamp down like a vice from day one and prevent trouble from getting started.

Clinton's "peace dividend" fantasies have cost us a fortune. And Powell is not entirely guiltless on that front either.

62 posted on 07/19/2007 12:57:25 PM PDT by Mad_as_heck (The MSM - America's (domestic) public enemy #1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson