To: tcrlaf
Ratcheting up the stakes in the wake of the GOP's successful blocking of a vote on Iraq withdrawal just moments ago, Harry Reid just announced on the Senate floor that he won't allow a vote on the entire Defense Authorization bill until the Senate GOP drops its filibustering of votes on Iraq.
I'm confused (again)!
Harry is planning to uphold the Defense Authorization bill because the GOP is filibustering it -- I don't think so?
As I understand it, a filibuster is "an attempt to extend debate upon a proposal in order to delay or completely prevent a vote on its passage."
Wouldn't the GOP gladly vote on the Iraq Withdrawal measure because Harry hasn't got the votes for it to pass?
274 posted on
07/19/2007 2:27:05 AM PDT by
Beckwith
(dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
To: Beckwith
Wouldn't the GOP gladly vote on the Iraq Withdrawal measure because Harry hasn't got the votes for it to pass? I think that's the problem...they do have the simple majority necessary to pass.
287 posted on
07/19/2007 10:41:54 AM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(Did Dennis Kucinich always look like that or did he have to submit to a series of shots? [firehat])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson