[kabar]

Good point. I would also remind you that the Joint Resolution On Iraq Passed By The United States Congress dated October 11, 2002 gave 23 reasons why we should take on Iraq, including the following:

"Whereas members of al-Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;"

[tobyhill]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1867733/posts

Check this dig out.

[AliVeritas]

Amen. If I had a dollar for every time I had to post that.

The kids sleeping over on the hill (not for troop funding, for troop pullout, but willing for immigration), have still not driven this point home... along with the fact of countries this moment being terrorized and the response of jihadists to those who turn tail, you’d think we’d know that already.

[Puddleglum]

Whereas members of al-Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;"

I am glad he was captured; however, this reason would justify attacking Saudi Arabia (and other "allies").