[Delacon]

This from a different and a bit more detailed article. Read the other article.

“Because their device is not yet optimized, they still need to input additional energy for the process to work. However, they hope that their results, which they presented at last month’s meeting of the American Chemical Society, will draw attention to the promise of the approach.”
http://www.physorg.com/news96107693.html

I hope it works out though. If it does, I wonder theory the left will think up to replace global warming to cripple the US economy.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Because their device is not yet optimized, they still need to input additional energy for the process to work.

Oh.

Ya needs MORE energy (to make the CO2 into CO) than what ya get from da sunlight falling on da (incredibly expensive) solar panels (which only generate usable power from 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM local every day anyway) .... So ya need to burn (some kind of mythical fuel) to convert (useful) CO2 into (poisonous) CO....