Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rhinoceros
Kaine line item vetoed all references to out of state drivers, from what I have been told.

I do not believe that is accurate. The reason that out of state drivers are exempt is that these new fines are not enforced by the Courts (where one would have due process and other rights). They are tacked onto your license, and you have to pay them to renew your license. My understanding is that the enforcement is done through DMV licensure proceedings, so there is no basis to "catch" out of state drivers in this net. The disparate treatment of out of state drivers is really what has most people riled up. As I understand it, going through DMV, rather than the courts, also severely curtailed the drivers' ability to challenge the fines. Bottom line, I think, is that the legislature decided to take enforcement shortcuts to grab this money from an unsympathetic group-- bad drivers-- and didn't count on the backlash from the disparate treatment of Virginia and non-Virginia drivers.

30 posted on 07/17/2007 8:57:33 AM PDT by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: GraceCoolidge

You’re right, Kaine did not line item veto out-of-state drivers.

I can think of only a couple of ways to make the people who use the roads pay for them — the gas tax (really a road user fee) and toll booths.


32 posted on 07/17/2007 8:59:44 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson