so, as I’m understanding the logic, congress wants to impose a tax on a legal product that is illegal to consume in the majority of businesses across the country while claiming that we must further reduce the number of smokers countrywide, for their health, then want to base a new program on revenue from an activity they’re trying to eradicate all the while relying on more of what they’re trying to wipe out..is that about right?
these guys get paid to think like this?? hell, I could do that job..
Yep, it defies logic.