Posted on 07/13/2007 8:59:09 PM PDT by doug from upland
Edited on 07/13/2007 11:57:49 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]
And WJC could, if he wanted to, use his charm to 'swoon' the ladies into dropping the panties, but that doesn't feed the Demon within.
The real challenge is what's going on in Hillary's brain that makes her an enabler- and I would go so far as to call her a co-defendant.
She is well aware of his particularites, and she is getting something to feed her inner demon too.
While WJC goes out and does his thing, he always comes home to Momma.
Her payoff?
Power. That makes her one scary individual.
Fortunately, she lacks the charm her 'husband' has and the herd of intended victims (the US public) senses a predator.
But I still give her an 80% chance of being the next POTUS.
You are right Doug. This story must be told over and over. This poor woman would be arrested because she asks a question.
This is one of the most important reasons, I will never vote for Hillary or her husband for anything. He is a rapist and she enabled him. When I heard about some of the senators and too many not going over to the Ford building to look over the former Presidents files and never doing anything about it; I was appalled. Yes, there are those who believe they can get away with affairs; etc; but rape. Never should anyone be allowed to get away with this.
I had a very sweet man ask my one time why I was so against Bill and Hillary Clinton. My answer was he raped a woman and she enabled him. To his credit, I believe he understood.
I will never forgive the Congress who should have known better than to allow this to take a backseat in history. They should have dealth with these two then.
I know there are a lot of things the Clintons have done; but to me this is the worst. They both violated a woman who cared about them and then threw her in the trash.
Never again.
Didn’t GWB get dinged for not knowing some obscure politician overseas?
If Hillary really doesn’t know Juanita Broderick is, can we trust her to know how to handle any policy issue, being so uninformed?
If she DOES know who Ms. Broderick is, and has to stage manage her public persona so as not to have to deal with it, how can we trust her to handle any real crisis?
Good points.
I am screaming and will not let up; until this man pays for this rape.
Then Susan E has got her head in the sand.
Doug, I apologize for so many posts; but this one thing makes me really angry and sad.
I have a question for all Freepers about an odd experience I frequently have regarding this.
Whenever I encounter Clintinoids, I ask them about the Broderick rape allegations.
In virtually every case, I get a blank stare in response. They’ve never heard of it and sometimes accuse me of making it up. And, of course, they have no interest in following up on it.
Is my experience unique? I thought the Myers story was a huge deal when it came out. Did it get buried under all the impeachment noise?
That is the picture of the commie qunt and how she’ll treat civil liberties if she’s ever elected.
NBC showed the piece when another network had on some award ceremony. Not enough people saw it. You saw what happened to George Allen and MACACA. If the press got on the story as they did with Allen’s faux pas, everyone would know. They don’t want everyone to know.
I just spoke with a Wall Street insider. These newspapers and radio stations are genuinely afraid of Hillary. She could take away their livelihood. She would do it if they make her angry.
As a Senator or Prez?
Because the Clintons in her mind are too powerful.
Of course the media has fully examined these allegations. (/Sarc)
But in Orwellian type thought, the believers don't want to examine it in their day to day world.
That's why fiction books such as "De Vinci Code" exist and do very well. They allow the mind to wander into, and challenge safely held concepts, knowing all the while it's made up by an writer out to make a buck.
Which is safer than to bring the harsh spotlight on to the reality of who they picked for the most powerful position in the world.
The media projects a "he cares about women and chillen", and if he has a few flaws?
They also use the tactic that Slick has women throwing themselves at him, he would never do something like rape.
"And who has he hurt?", they rationalize.
Broaddrick? "Why she was a capitalist, seeking favors from a powerful politician.
Katherine Willey? ..."Well she was a volunteer at the White House, just begging for a chance to be close to someone successful as compared to her husband".
Except for the lying to a federal court, the Lewinsky affair actually helped him.
WJC is pretty transparent, the real quest is figuring out his co-defendant and enabler, Mrs. WJC.
Ironically, I've talked to a number of liberals and even Lefty's who find her scary, but they will still vote for her.
prez
If I were you, i’d call the Monica Crowley Show on WABC radio right now... she just said she’ll be talking about the Clintons.
I’m calling 800.848.WABC but no one is answering.
A *must* read!
Thank you again, doug!
Great story-—Hope it gets some legs!!
Hillary can’t run forever!
I BELIEVE JUANITA!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.