Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ellery
Your willingness to write them off as irrelevant indicates to me that you’re not really interested in the info — so good luck to you.

That was the best you could find?

With respect, I was not looking for long winded, years old, dated material, that was rambling at best.

I did not write them off, and only asked for relevant material. You posted very dated material, years old, much of which was directed at then President Clinton. Come on.

Honestly, nothing you posted impressed me in the least.

Years old speeches in the Senate don't cut it. I simply asked for someone to show me Thompson's outrage over this expanding government and our lawless borders. I wanted to see, as a representative, where his outrage was, and where he was demanding something be done.

If we're going to chose a president, this time we'd better chose one with some fire in the belly, one who is genuinely outraged over expanding government, and our chaotic, lawless borders.

Otherwise, conservatives will lose big in 08.

208 posted on 07/13/2007 8:51:45 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: dragnet2

Honestly, I think your comment was a bit rambling. If you want to read info about any of the candidates, it’s easy enough to find.


212 posted on 07/13/2007 9:33:18 PM PDT by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

To: dragnet2

Thompson’s arguments against the export act, discussing important national security threats and delivered on Sept. 4, 2001 were directed against Bush.

Thompson’s recent statements on these issues are widely available here on FR — if you’re interested, just go through the key word index and you’ll find them (or browse the fredthompson index). It’s not worthwhile for me to find them for you, because you and I apparently differ on what’s impressive and important. So, it’s best that you look and judge for yourself. If nothing in those speeches impressed you in the least, I also suspect we differ so greatly in priorities that I wouldn’t be able to help you even if I had time.

FReegards.


219 posted on 07/13/2007 10:36:44 PM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson