To: Mad Marine Mama; xzins; jude24; Girlene; All
Word is that LCpl. Sharrat has now been granted testimonial immunity as a defense witness. This bolsters the defense case for both LCpl. Tatum and Sgt. Wuterich. LCpl. Sharratt did not enter houses one or two but provided covering fire with a SAW for both assaults.
From Day One, the media has suggested that anyone given testimonial immunity must be in the prosecutor's pocket or must have made some kind of deal. I never believed that, and have taken a certain amount of abuse (not from you guys) for saying "trust the process and trust the Corps". Don Dinsmore came to the same conclusion after his meeting with General Mattis.
26 posted on
07/11/2007 6:07:44 AM PDT by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.com)
To: RedRover
What exactly is defense testimonial immunity?
27 posted on
07/11/2007 6:10:27 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: RedRover
"trust the process and trust the Corps". You were right, Red. I believe this shows that the process is working and also shows these Art 32's had to take place to keep the naysayers like murtha and the moonbat media from screaming coverup. I also believe Don Dinsmore came to that same conclusion after his meeting with Gen. Mattis.
38 posted on
07/11/2007 7:45:18 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson