Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
He wants states to be allowed to continue the killing of the innocent unborn.

You're confusing Fred with Rudy...

Even assuming Thompson isn't more pro-life than he was when he first ran for the Senate, he still has consistently opposed Roe vs. Wade. I have no doubt he supports judges that would overturn it.

That's all one can ask out of President -- the appointment of judges that would overturn Roe. The rest would be up to pro-lifers at the state level.

With Ghouliani or Hillary, there is no chance judges would be appointed that would overturn Roe.

475 posted on 07/10/2007 2:55:20 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky
That's all one can ask out of President -- the appointment of judges that would overturn Roe.

Wrong. That's not the only thing that is needed. We need an Executive who will remember his sworn oath, and then act to uphold it. Last time I checked, the Fourteenth Amendment was the most fundamental part of what they swear to protect.

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Too bad so many seem to have excised it from their copies...

479 posted on 07/10/2007 2:59:30 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Implement the FairTax and be free and prosperous, or stick with the StupidTax...it's up to you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson