Of course, that argument was about Romney. No shock that in the end, neither Romney and Thompson give a rip about applying the Fourteenth Amendment to the protection of persons in the womb. In other words, they are out of step with the Reagan Republican pro-life platform.
“No shock that in the end, neither Romney and Thompson give a rip about applying the Fourteenth Amendment to the protection of persons in the womb. In other words, they are out of step with the Reagan Republican pro-life platform.”
Wrong. They are not in lockstep with you 100%, so you denounce them in extreme ways. Most normal people see their opposition to roe v wade and their support for unborn life as sufficient to call them ‘prolife’, no matter what you say.
In fact, the Reagan Republican “pro-life platform” calls for a *constitutional amendment* to protect unborn life. You are out of step with the party’s platform, concepts of judicial restraint, and basic federalism and limited governmnet if you think the 14th amendment already bars what a Constitutional human life amendment would. Practically speaking, Roe would be overturned soon if we put 2 more conservative judges on the bench; the amendment would never happen; thus, the best path forward is the one Thompson and Romney advocate. You dont save lifes or defend liberty when you pervert Constituional amendments beyond their purpose.
you are practically a shill for the Soros-left, doing your best to sow dissention and disunity and bad political thinking and practices; your ways are the ways of extremists who lose. A much better activist and GOP leader gave some good advice: Dont be against things, be FOR things. All your braying and denouncing everybody who doesnt share your view on the 14th amendment has saved this many unborn humans from abortion: Zero.
It’s time you stopped bashing those who don’t agree with you 100% and strated supported and helping those who agree with you 95% (that’s still an “A” on the curve).