[G8 Diplomat]

He certainly was pro-choice in 1994, but the evidence since then indicates he has changed.

And the evidence is...

His position on this isn't clear-cut. He was pro-choice but never voted that way, now he's supposedly pro-life but isn't sure that life begins at conception?

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

>>isn’t sure that life begins at conception<<

You keep bringing back 1994 statements, which is OK, but don’t state them as if they were current. Your use of the present tense here and and in other cases is, to put it politely, misleading.

So your theory is that he has always been pro-choice, but he voted 100% against his beliefs. Seems unlikely to me. Plus his present stated position is that Rowe v Wade should be overturned.