That's an outrageous, chickens--t response to this situation. The man has four young kids, for God's sake. He's a scumbag, pure and simple. Being a sinner doesn't mean that we condemn others for their offenses, particularly when they are more serious than one's own.
We need to stop accepting this type of conduct, or all you're going to get is more. Any wonder why we read that oral sex has become all the rage amongst younger teens? Thank you, Bill Clinton. We need to roll this back, not accept it or excuse it. Period.
Vitter should resign.
That's an outrageous, chickens--t response to this situation. The man has four young kids, for God's sake. He's a scumbag, pure and simple. Being a sinner doesn't mean that we condemn others for their offenses, particularly when they are more serious than one's own.
We need to stop accepting this type of conduct, or all you're going to get is more. Any wonder why we read that oral sex has become all the rage amongst younger teens? Thank you, Bill Clinton. We need to roll this back, not accept it or excuse it. Period.
Young children. How young and when was the incidence? Perhaps it happened before the little ones were born.
He addressed the issue with his family YEARS ago.
That's an outrageous, chickens--t response to this situation.
I agree with GreatOne (though wouldn't go so far as calling it 'outrageous.')
That phrase is one of the most misconstrued sayings of Jesus. It's used by Leftists (who care nothing for any other quotes from the Bible) who would try to excuse away all kinds of Dimocrat misbehavior by calling on us to be 'non-judgmental.'
Jesus wanted us to be judgmental-- maybe not to 'cast stones' at sinners, but certainly to rebuke them.
Also, a minor point:
It should be "Let him who is without sin..." (not "Let he...").
If people are going to use the phrase, they should at least try to get the grammar right...and remember to finish the quote: "Go and sin no more."