[bajabaja]

Wait, you are using data on NON-SMOKERS contracting lung cancer to dispute a 10% lifetime risk of lung cancer on the part of SMOKERS?

That is an interesting approach to analysis.

I look forward to data that actually concerns SMOKERS and LUNG CANCER, not what you have posted. (I’ve given mine, but you countered it with irrelevant studies on an unrelated question. If you have relevant studies on the issue, please, by all means, show us.)

Check out the Harvard site again. People don’t get grants if they fabricate data.

Again, for others reading this post, the data and studies show about a 10% lifetime risk of lung cancer for SMOKERS. Poster Just Another Joe sites studies for NON-SMOKER (second hand smoke) cancer risk.

[Just another Joe]

And if you will look at Post 171 you will see my rationale for showing you those studies.

Once again, all you have linked me to so far are press releases or hypothetical estimates done on hypothetical groupings.