Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bnelson44

This nation is at war. In light of this fact The Times editorial is not “protected speech.” It is treason.

The Times has repeatedly violated national security with its reporting on interrogation techniques, intelligence monitoring of terrorist finances, etc. Could it be any clearer that the Times is in business to serve our enemies?

Why haven’t the Times’ presses been shut down and its publisher, editors and reporters jailed? Why is Bush afraid of sending a clear message to the liberal traitors in our midst?


13 posted on 07/07/2007 10:57:37 PM PDT by California Desert Rat (Islam's biggest supporter: the Democratic National Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: California Desert Rat

I think you have it backwards, Rat:

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.” Theodore Roosevelt, 1918


31 posted on 07/08/2007 12:48:48 PM PDT by cousin_ishmael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson