Posted on 07/07/2007 9:54:02 PM PDT by pissant
Imagine you're the district attorney character on, say, television's long-running "Law and Order." You have five witnesses who say they either saw the accused, or learned contemporaneously, that the accused did the alleged bad thing.
Then imagine the accused's defense is essentially a variant of "I don't recall. There's no paper trail. Nope, I didn't do it." And the accused has a friendly witness who at first doesn't recollect if the accused did the bad thing, then ratchets up to "It didn't happen."
If you're the DA, you probably still think you've got a case, right? Maybe you'll just let the jury decide.
That appears to be where we're at in case of The People v. Fred Thompson, the people being family-planning types who say they hired Thompson to lobby the first Bush White House to overturn an anti-abortion executive order. The story was broken by Michael Finnegan of the Los Angeles Times.
Thompson, the former Tennessee Republican senator who appears to be running for president even though he hasn't yet officially announced, says, through a spokesperson, he didn't do the lobbying at all back in 1991. That's a surprise to the family-planning folks who say that's exactly what they hired him to do back during his Washington lobbyist days, to specifically lobby then-White House chief of staff John Sununu.
This matters, of course, because Thompson has been wooing the anti-abortion activists and social conservatives so important to winning the Republican nomination. They're on the jury.
If this story gains legs, that increases Thompson's challenge in winning over that group. If the people who recall signing on Thompson to lobby the first Bush White House are seen as more credible, Thompson will not only suffer with those opposed to abortion but also more generallly because his truthfulness will become
(Excerpt) Read more at weblogs.chicagotribune.com ...
I work with a large engineering firm. If a co-worker came and asked for advice on how to size a vent line I might not know I helped design a Gay bathhouse. Legal questions could be even more convoluted and may not point back to the client or cause. I would have to answer I do not recall if I helped design a gay bathhouse, but I am pretty sure I did not.
Yup. The LA Times is on Par with the tabloids.
Weasels like pissant? LOL. Get your panties unstuck there toots.
Hey, many or the fredheads have believed his claim that he’s always been pro-life too. Until it has been demonstrated to be false.
Ouch!
Peddle your BS to someone more naive. In my estimation, after reading most, if not all of the Thompson-related threads you’ve started, you are a cultivator of misinformation—a hatchet man. All for Duncan Hunter who isn’t even a blip on the political radar and isn’t going to be the president of anything except, perhaps his local Lions Club.
I am in no way trying to get any SPANKED by Jimrob (besides one has to really piss him off to get spanked). I guess I got a little carried away, thought I was being helpful, sorry for my sick sense of humor...
My statement was BS? Fred has always been pro-life?
Either that, or they think they can beat Rudy. They certainly could not beat Thompson, and they know it.
Well, it's a good thing that the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune aren't owned by the same company, or one would begin to think that a Communications Stream of Conspiracy Commerce was in action against Fred Thompson.
Oh, wait - both companies ARE owned by the Tribune Company.
Whaddaya know about that!
;-)
Your “peddle your BS” comment was a response to my “many fredheads believed...” post. So excuse me for misinterpreting.
This story has a 98% chance of being utter nonsense. But your “hatchetman” crap is getting old. I want the records to be clear on ALL the candidates. But I appreciate your ability to predict the future. I’ll tell you this much. If Hunter does get the name recognition to compete in the top tier, there will be no small flotilla of Fredheads jumping ship.
There you go again, with the reasonable doubt/Devil’s Advocate routine.
Yep. that’s why its likely to be nonsense. But note the Boston Herald ran with it too.
I dunno, was Reagan always a Republican?
Considering his recent voting record, what the hell does it matter?
ROFL got that right.
I’ll tell you what. I’ll be satisfied with the Fred team response, if this is all the Times has. My guess is that every MSM hack right now is digging into it deeper, as are the rivals campaigns. If it has legs, it will be evident shortly. For now, it’s just a smear that needs to be drop kicked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.