Posted on 07/07/2007 9:54:02 PM PDT by pissant
That would not suprise me. She’s got the same hacks as Bill had working her campaign.
He already has. Do a FR search on Thompson and abortion. Read what’s out there.
The RATS are really, really running scared of FRed. Hasn’t even announced yet and he’s being treated as a serious contender. I bet FRed has a big grin on his face. I bet he eats this up!
Point me to his response, please, if you know. I’ve looked for it via google, and could not find it.
Is it a lame line of attack?
I think this was written about Planned Parenthood — hardly the equivalent of Natural Family Planning.
IF it were true (doubtful), it would be devastating.
Have you read ALL the links posted at #19 above?
If you have, then all your questions should have been answered.
I was just reading this little snippet. I had not read the article from the leftist LAT times. I now see the whole thing came from Hillary.
They just put the addend (family planning) into this title.
Typically bias of the LAT
Well, in one, he does say he has no recollection of doing so. That’s kinda weak.
THis is a Chicago Trib article on the original LA TImes story.
It’s to easy for FRed, I’m alive am I not!
Well, somebody better refute it in a hurry, regardless of where the source originated.
Oui
And that’s not good enough for you? What would it take to convince you?
Weak!
Put me in that category. Half the time I can't remember what I ate the previous night for dinner let alone something that supposedly happened 16 years ago.
I’ve been an engineer for 20+ years. I remember every project I’ve worked on. And if someone accused me of designing a gay bathhouse, I would know immediately that it was untrue and say so. Not “I can’t recall”.
In the original LA Times article:
"A spokesman for the former Tennessee senator denied that Thompson did the lobbying work. "
"Thompson spokesman Mark Corallo adamantly denied that Thompson worked for the family planning group. "Fred Thompson did not lobby for this group, period," he said in an e-mail.
In a telephone interview, he added: "There's no documents to prove it, there's no billing records, and Thompson says he has no recollection of it, says it didn't happen."
Corallo, the spokesman for Thompson, was asked Friday about the board minutes and the five people who said they recalled Thompson accepting the lobbying assignment. He responded in an e-mail, saying that Thompson "may have been consulted by one of [his] firm's partners who represented this group in 1991."
Corallo said it was "not unusual for one lawyer on one side of an issue to be asked to give advice to colleagues for clients who engage in conduct or activities with which they personally disagree."
Then in this article: Thompson wows young Republicans
"Thompson's speech came on the heels of reports that a pro-abortion rights group hired him to lobby President George H.W. Bush's administration 16 years ago. At issue were attempts to ease a regulation that prevented clinics that received federal money from offering abortion counseling.
"I'd just say the flies get bigger in the summertime. I guess the flies are buzzing," said Thompson, who is considering running for president as a social conservative. He refused comment on whether he recalled doing the work. "
Sounds like Corallo was doing a little two-stepping. Adamantly deny, then say , well, gee, he may have helped a colleague. Not sure what it means, but he better get on top of it.
I know Michael Finnegan. I have to work with Michael Finnegan. Michael Finnegan does not BREAK stories -- especially in campaigns. He re-types reports handed to him by liberal Democrat operatives. This whole thing stinks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.