| Fred Thompson | |
| 61.1% |   |
| Duncan Hunter | |
| 38.9% | |
Eventually the man is going to have to actually say something that means something.
It acknowledges the attack without dignifying it, and is effective and brilliant.
“Sorry, but it means that the attacks are irrelevant annoyances, like flies of gnats (a term he used before with reference to the “pole” insult on his wife.”)
It acknowledges the attack without dignifying it, and is effective and brilliant.”
Is every question about controversial issues that pertain to Fred going to be considered attacks and irrelevant annoyances? We are talking about answering a question about an issue of importance to conservative voters. Refusing to reply is neither effective nor brilliant, in fact, it tells me more about what the man, than his answer.
| Fred Thompson | |
| 61.1% | |
| Duncan Hunter | |
| 38.9% | |