Exactly! How does evolution explain their appearance factually beyond all need to speculate, hypothesize, theorize, fill in a gap or two?
Your answers, like mine will involve, at some point, something along the lines, “We just don’t know definitively at this point.” (though I might use a scriptural reference along the lines, “Now, we see through a glass darkly.”)
Most evolutionists will refuse to even acknowledge the idea that the missing 10, 20, 30, 80 whatever percent they do not know/understand “yet” (they must ever insist that, like the calvary, these missing bits and pieces are on the way)—they will steadfastly refuse to acknowledge that what they do not now currently possess as fact, is believed on through faith. Their system of thought requires a component of belief in what is not known, just like the religionist.
Yeah God made a mistake, erased them and accidentally left evidence of his falliability.
Well said. However, the evolutionist does not admit that it is an act of faith that replaces their missing evidence. Instead, they will insist that such evidence already exists and then ridicule others for doubting its existence.
Incidentally, it takes far more faith to be an evolutionist than it does to be a religionist. It is more probable for a tornado to strike a junkyard of spare airplane parts and leave a fully assembled Boeing 747 in its wake than it is for life to have formed out of inorganic matter.