[razzle]

The scientific method requires: Observation, Hypothesis formulation, Prediction, and Testing of Predictions. Since we have never observed one species changing to another (nor is there any indirect evidence of this), darwinism fails in step one. Its all religious belief anyway.

[Coyoteman]

The scientific method requires: Observation, Hypothesis formulation, Prediction, and Testing of Predictions. Since we have never observed one species changing to another (nor is there any indirect evidence of this), darwinism fails in step one.

Sorry, that happens not to be the case. (Is that an example of creation "science"? Are real scientists supposed to be impressed?)

Its all religious belief anyway.

What's that, the latest creationist talking point?

Creationists are doing their disingenuous best to pretend that their religion is science (ID), all the while claiming that legitimate science is religion. What a mixed up bunch!

[Locke_2007]

Here’s a link to evidence of transitional forms; which you claim do not exist:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html#morphological_intermediates

Furthermore, all those opposing evolution and quoting Scripture as proof that evolution is not true, should think of this: If God created the Universe, and, by extension, the Earth, they why did He create the Earth and FILL IT WITH FALSE EVIDENCE TO LEAD US ASTRAY FROM HIS TRUE PATH? I am constantly amazed at the rejection of science and the lengths otherwise sensible people will go to in order to cling to their mythical beliefs. Evolution has been proven to a scientific certainty to all those who are capable of understanding and analyzing the mountains of evidence in favor of it.