Well this caught my eye (remember this is provided as evidence to back up the claim that Ann got it all wrong):
Hitler didn't invent Darwinism, he just used it as an excuse to "clense" the races. . . .Gee, really? Then why do his private notes show that he based his idea of inferior races on the Bible?Now, to understand how strange this claim is, one would be required to have read the Bible, which spells out directly that the chosen race is -- anybody? anybody?
And to think that Hitler "based his idea of inferior races" on a work that called one particular race the Chosen; in which God says to Zion "you are my people", is a delusion of which only an atheist is capable.
So going over it point by point is not likely worth the time. It seems filled with literature bluffing (seven misrepresentations but not willing to say what they are?)
It looks like Ann still rocks.
How utterly expected.
Your point appears to be that you don't understand how someone would, for his own purposes, selectively use the Bible. I invite you to visit FR's Religion Forum, where all the Good Christians tear each other to shreds, all for the Love of God. They all use the Bible. Without casting aspersions on the folks at the Religion Forum here, I'll note that most Christian anti-Semites base their prejudice on the Bible. Case in point: the KKK. Good, God-fearing Christians all -- just ask them.
And that's the straw you're going to grasp to swallow unexamined all of Ann's distortions and sloppy use of secondary sources.
And you wonder why the people who understand the science can't take your side seriously.
It looks like Ann still rocks.
It looks like Ichny has scored a knockout (or rather three).