Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Hillary] Clinton Draws Distictions on Pardons
UK Guardian ^ | Tuesday July 3, 2007 7:16 PM | Mike Glover

Posted on 07/03/2007 12:57:27 PM PDT by hardback

Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton drew a distinction between President Bush's decision to commute the sentence of White House aide I. Lewis ``Scooter'' Libby - which she has harshly criticized - and her husband's 140 pardons in his closing hours in office.

``I believe that presidential pardon authority is available to any president, and almost all presidents have exercised it,'' Clinton said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press.

``This (the Libby decision) was clearly an effort to protect the White House. ... There isn't any doubt now, what we know is that Libby was carrying out the implicit or explicit wishes of the vice president, or maybe the president as well, in the further effort to stifle dissent.''

Libby, a former chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney, had been sentenced to 30 months in prison as well as two years' probation and a $250,000 fine for perjury in connection with the leaking of CIA agent Valerie Plane's name to reporters.

Just hours after a federal appeals court rejected Libby's appeal, Bush announced his decision to commute the prison term portion of the sentence, which he labeled excessive.

As she campaigns with her husband for Iowa's leadoff precinct caucuses, Clinton has joined other Democrats in ripping Bush's decision. In the interview, she said it was ``one more example'' of the Bush administration thinking ``it is above the rule of law.''

Her husband's pardons, issued in the closing hours of his presidency, were simply routine exercise in the use of the pardon power, and none were aimed at protecting the Clinton presidency or legacy, she said.

``This particular action by the president is one more piece of evidence in their ongoing disregard for the rule of law that they think they don't have to answer to,'' she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2007 12:57:29 PM PDT by hardback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hardback
``I believe that presidential pardon authority is available to any president, and almost all presidents have exercised it,'' Clinton said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press.

I'm sure her list is already of recordbreaking length.

2 posted on 07/03/2007 12:58:59 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Life is an episode of Green Acres. THEN you die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback
``I believe that presidential pardon authority is available to any president, and almost all presidents have exercised it,'' Clinton said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press.

How many presidents pardoned terrorists?

3 posted on 07/03/2007 12:58:59 PM PDT by b4its2late (Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback

Yes Bill only pardons people who pay us with huge bags of cash.


4 posted on 07/03/2007 1:00:07 PM PDT by stockpirate (Juan` McCain and Jorge` W Bush, two birds of a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback
Her husband's pardons, issued in the closing hours of his presidency, were simply routine exercise in the use of the pardon power, and none were aimed at protecting the Clinton presidency or legacy, she said.

Nor were they aimed at protecting the United States.

5 posted on 07/03/2007 1:00:24 PM PDT by b4its2late (Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback
and none were aimed at protecting the Clinton presidency or legacy

Some sure put Americans at risk though...
6 posted on 07/03/2007 1:00:41 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback

> Her husband’s pardons, issued in the closing hours of his presidency, were simply routine exercise in the use of the pardon power, and none were aimed at protecting the Clinton presidency or legacy, she said. <

Bravo Sierra! Susan McDougal was certainly hushed up, and Roger Clinton was spared having the names of his cocaine customers (one of whom I expect was Billy Boy) revealed in court. Lying $itch!


7 posted on 07/03/2007 1:00:42 PM PDT by NoBullZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

The single charge that Libby was convicted of was based on the Jury believing Tim Russert’s testimony over his. The Jury took Russert’s side because Denis Collins the Jury Foreman is a neighbor and friend of Russert.


8 posted on 07/03/2007 1:00:59 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hardback
Her husband's pardons, were simply routine and none were aimed at protecting the Clinton presidency or legacy, she said......

Her husbands pardons had price tags affixed to them.

9 posted on 07/03/2007 1:01:15 PM PDT by rface (I love GW Bush .... but I don't always agree with him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback

Of all the gaul...this woman is as shameless as her husband.. and that’s saying a lot!


10 posted on 07/03/2007 1:01:40 PM PDT by vigilence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
How many presidents pardoned terrorists?

Or girlfriend's husband.

11 posted on 07/03/2007 1:01:57 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hardback

In March 1995, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno secured the appointment of an Independent Counsel, David Barrett to investigate allegations that Cisneros had lied to FBI investigators during background checks prior to being named Secretary of HUD. He had been asked about payments that he had made to former mistress Linda Medlar, also known as Linda Jones. The affair had been ‘public knowledge’ for a number of years - during the 1992 presidential campaign, U.S. Treasurer Catalina Vasquez Villalpando publicly referred to Cisneros and candidate Clinton as “two skirt-chasers” - but Cisneros lied about the amount of money he had paid to Medlar. The investigation continued for three and a half years.

In December, 1997, Cisneros was indicted on 18 counts of conspiracy, giving false statements and obstruction of Justice. Medlar used some of the Cisneros hush money to purchase a house and entered into a bank fraud scheme with her sister and brother-in-law to conceal the source of the money. In January, 1998, Medlar pleaded guilty to 28 charges of bank fraud, conspiracy to commit bank fraud and obstruction of justice.

In September, 1999, Cisneros negotiated a plea agreement, under which he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor count of lying to the FBI, and was fined $10,000. He did not receive jail-time or probation. He was pardoned by President Bill Clinton in January 2001 ( See: List of people pardoned by Bill Clinton). The independent counsel investigation continued after the pardon focusing on alleged obstruction of justice. In May 2005, Senator Dorgan (D-ND) proposed ending funding for the investigation; negotiators refused to include the provision in a bill funding military operations in Afghanistan. The funding at that point for the investigation totaled $21 million.

According to a New York Daily News report on October 3, 2005, “lawyers are fighting to suppress a potentially embarrassing final report from the probe that found Housing Secretary Henry Cisneros lied to the FBI about paying $250,000 in hush money to his ex-mistress. ... Lawyers at the Washington firm Williams and Connolly who work for Cisneros and both Clintons have argued to judges overseeing the case that allegations of illegal activity, for which no charges were filed, should be snipped before the report is made public.” [2].


12 posted on 07/03/2007 1:02:07 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoBullZone

Wasn’t Roger getting coke delivered to Bill’s apartment in Little Rock or something?


13 posted on 07/03/2007 1:02:14 PM PDT by hardback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hardback
``This (the Libby decision) was clearly an effort to protect the White House. ... There isn't any doubt now, what we know is that Libby was carrying out the implicit or explicit wishes of the vice president, or maybe the president as well, in the further effort to stifle dissent.''

This is Hillaryspeak for 'the best way to quiet the SOB's is to off them'.

14 posted on 07/03/2007 1:02:42 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback
This (the Libby decision) was clearly an effort to protect the White House.

Translation: Libby should have bought a pardon, fair and square.

15 posted on 07/03/2007 1:02:56 PM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback

“Don’t those stupid Republicans know what a damned Pardon is sells for these days???? How DARE they Devalue the currency of the Democratic Party!!”-Hillary Clinton


16 posted on 07/03/2007 1:03:49 PM PDT by tcrlaf (VOTE Democrat! You don't those stinkin' Freedoms anyway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback
Pretty cheeky, considering the only reason her husband didn’t go to jail for perjury is Ken Starr knew he couldn’t get a conviction from a D.C. jury.
17 posted on 07/03/2007 1:03:53 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback

Suprised the ‘smartest woman in the world’ decided to cross that minefield.


18 posted on 07/03/2007 1:03:57 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback

Let me guess.

“Her Husband’s” pardons good.

Bush pardons bad.


19 posted on 07/03/2007 1:05:13 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardback

Yes, there is a difference, you obnoxious cow. No one was being paid for a presidential pardon in this case, which couldn’t be said of the pardons your worthless brothers sold at the end of the Fornicator-in-Chief’s presidency. I’ll stack Libby’s commutation up against Henry Cisneros’s full pardon any day. He should have been in prison for lying to the FBI, as I recall.


20 posted on 07/03/2007 1:05:18 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson