Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LA Woman3
In the past, when medical science wasn’t so advanced, when a terminal disease couldn’t be extended far beyond it’s typical duration, people died in what could probably be called “God’s” time.

Today, the expectation of a miracle, the personal and family pressure to “DO SOMETHING” , and the medical field’s “this is the prescribed treatment” philosophy has blurred that line.

I certainly would never condemn any individual’s desire to pursue any avenue to extend their life..or end it if the time became evident.

36 posted on 07/02/2007 9:24:22 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: berdie

I agree with you. Medical advancements/technology is a wonderful thing. It’s allowed so many to survive when in the past it wouldn’t have been possible. It also brought about decisions, questions, uncertainty that wasn’t there previously.

I feel/think/believe the same about the medical tech available now with ultrasounds, pre natal care, NICU, etc. Unborn babies and babies born way too early are surviving when decades ago they wouldn’t have. We’re seeing babies in the womb, viable long before they used to be. It’s crimping the pro abortion argument. And we’re seeing the flip side, babies who wouldn’t have made it decades ago and the adversity they’ll have to deal with.

ITA with you. The line is blurred moreso now. I believe it should be up to the family involved.

I thought about this recently concerning the Terri Schiavo case. Her parents were willing to care for her. It should have been their decision, imo.


40 posted on 07/02/2007 10:56:50 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson