So cleaning up “bad” information from AFIP involves making misleading statements about it, right?
Like claiming they published a spectrum showing only silicon and not silica, right?
Does Meselson still claim less than 1 g of anthrax was released at Sverdlovsk?
As stated above, the comment was made by the author of the article. We have nothing to show that what the author wrote had anything to do with what Professor Meselson said. We certainly don't have any actual quote from Professor Meselson.
You may believe that Professor Meselson is "misleading the media," even though the C&EN article clearly shows that the author interviewed MANY sources. You may believe that Professor Meselson "duped" Douglas Beecher into adding comments about the attack anthrax to his report, but that report was supported by many scientists who actually worked with the attack anthrax.
You may see Professor Meselson as some evil mastermind who is misleading the media and duping FBI scientists in order to show you to be wrong about the attack anthrax. But the FACTS also show you to be wrong. And arguing about petty matters and things that happened 30 years ago doesn't change the fact that YOU are the one who is trying to mislead the media and everyone else about the attack anthrax of 2001. It seems very clear that you attack Professor Meselson because he is showing that everything you have said about the attack anthrax of 2001 was a load of crap.