Posted on 07/01/2007 8:58:07 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
I tried doing things that way when I started the site back in November of 2001, but things quickly fell apart.
Most media links change or are removed from the original site after a few days. The Washington Post, for example, moves their articles to a section of their site where you have to pay to view the articles. Many (like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal) require a subscription or membership to view any article.
I don't want to refer to an article that people cannot see without signing up. I want people to be able to read the articles I read and/or cite. AND I want to be able to go back and do research in the old articles myself. Very very few free original articles remain around forever.
When I realized what was happening, I started making my own copies. At first, I tried having links to both my own copy and the original. But the links to the originals were becoming invalid one by one, so I just stopped bothering with them. I just make a copy and use my copy. The only alternative seems to be to spend most of my time every day trying to figure out where the vanished articles are now located or if they've vanished into archives which you have to pay to view.
If that reduces my "level of journalistic or academic integrity", so be it.
BTW, how are your book sales going?
Very very slow. Since only one magazine reviewed it, few people know about it. And probably only one person in a hundred who visits my site buys and reads books.
But it doesn't take much to spur sales. A couple months ago some guy on Salon.com mentioned me and my book, and every copy Amazon.com had (which was only 2 or 3) sold out almost instantly.
But I guess he's not trying to add to the body of serious academic research with a peer-reviewed publication, so I won't worry about it.
p.s. Badabing Badasomething else used to be TrebleRebels old pen name. So lets not have a tag team on Mr. Lake.
Aha, so you've been here before? I thought I recognized the stylings. I'm BB's daughter. Just call me Spawn of BB.
Uh, no, let's do "tag team" him, and anyone else who participates. We're all adults here, and we can all stand critical responses to our own statements. I claim no technical knowledge of most of this discussion, but I do find the posts interesting, and enjoy participating when I can. I happen to be a stickler for proper referencing, because I don't believe everything I read unless I can read a proper citation. If he stands so firmly by his facts, then he should be equally firm in his citations.
Yes, it makes it easier to aerosolize. Permits greater concentration. Down to a uniform 1 micron. It operates like a gas once the excess silica is removed through repeated centrifugation. Highly sophisticated product. Source of know how was state bioweapons program.
The advance in silica nanoparticles led to really, really small silica particles. Big breakthrough about 2001 See manufacturer’s webpage (especially through Wayback machine).
I was just kidding about not understanding Bill Nye — I taught him everything he knows.
As for the military expert who makes the anthrax simulant, you have his name and know his credentials. I very likely forwarded you all the email messages. So if you want to pick a playground fight, pick it with him privately. The fact his lab was raided by the FBI gives him some street cred. If you don’t want to admit you were right, that’s fine by me. Surely you can appreciate that there is value in soliciting opinions from microbiologists working in the field.
Note they indicted a fellow about 6 miles from the mailbox recently.
He had mirrored Al Qaeda’s website (kept it up)
The website had explained some of the code used in the letters in a FAQ.
So it’s not like they are sitting home quilting.
And as far as Mr. Lake's comment about his site visitors, I regularly visit his site for updates and just speaking for myself I am currently in the middle of reading The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas, a fictional account of a young French sailor caught up in a conspiracy and falsely imprisoned, who later escapes and seeks revenge upon his persecutors. So I must be one of the one in a hundred.
Seriously, an indictment? Do you have a source on the web for this? I never saw a news account anywhere.
That is complete nonsense. AFIP is NOT the media. Is that difficult for you to understand?
Hmm. What you fail to understand is that quote is not from me. It should be very clear that it's a quote from Chemical & Engineering News. I put the quotes in blue. Didn't they show up in blue for you?
Am I seeing a pattern here? You are shown to be totally wrong on something, so you change the subject and move on to something else. When you are shown to be totally wrong on that, you change the subject and move on to something else. And you repeat this process ad nausium.
We've argued all these things a dozen times in the past. But you just pretend you were never shown to be wrong, and a few months later you use the same arguments all over again as if they were brand new arguments.
Do you have some kind of memory problem where you cannot remember what happened more than a few days ago?
There were all sorts of errors made in the very early days of the investigation. Those errors have been perpetuated by the media and by the fact that people at places like AFIP do not want to point out errors they made, so they leave them uncorrected.
AFIP's error and all the other errors about "oozing spores" and imaginary coatings are very clearly explained in Chapter 15 of my book. You can read it by clicking HERE.
I wish then, you’d encourage him to link Mueller’s press conference explaining the status of Amerithrax. I think Mueller, who is regularly briefed on Amerithrax, is very smart and has great integrity. And what he says is important.
Do you have a link? I can’t find one.
Please review Free Republic's Updated FR Excerpt and Link Only or Deny Posting List due to Copyright Complaints before posting again. Thanks.
I put the name of the media organization, the date and all other relative information on every article I archive.
In nearly six years, no one has ever complained about "reliablity" before. If they think I just manufactured some article, they can usually do a Google search and find another copy somewhere.
Many times I do Google searches for things and stumble upon articles which I never saw before. They are often on other sites like mine. I copy them over and archive them, too.
It's all done with copy and paste, so I don't have to retype anything. But you can't please everybody, so some may want to try to find other sources. That's their privilege.
A couple months ago, someone sent me an article that was really bizarre. I couldn't verify the source, so I didn't put it on my site. It quickly turned out to be an article from some magazine like "The Onion." It was a satire.
Uh, no, let's do "tag team" him
I don't mind being "tag teamed". My analysis and my information is solid. It'll stand up to any assault from any number of people who go just by beliefs.
And I'd love to be "tag teamed" by people who actually look at facts and have NEW facts to present. Unfortunately, that's probably a hopeless wish.
Hmm. It's almost 5 p.m. Time for me to shut down until 9 a.m. tomorrow.
Admin,
I believe you are referring to my post of a long article that I wrote that began with (apparently too many) short paragraphs from a Washington Post article. So only those sentences need be redacted, if you like, as the rest of the writing is mine. I don’t recall any post I’ve made with a complete “Washington Post” article.
But as an intellectual property rights litigator and an expert on the “fair use” doctrine, I certainly appreciate your keen vigilance and defer to your judgment. For example, I got an injunction from the bench of Taco Bell’s “Run For The Border”, the most successful television advertising campaign in history under the Lanham Act. The San Diego federal district court judge issued the injunction on his own motion (at my suggestion) and you could see the bottoms of the NYC Taco Bell attorneys pucker at 20 yards.
So I’ll be glad to comply with your directives and guidelines as I think the availability of Free Republic is great and wish you continued success.
Here is the post, assuming it is the one to which you were referring, without the Washington Post paragraphs saying the FBI suspected al-Timimi of being involved in the anthrax attacks.
I realize it is long but avoiding an aerosolized anthrax attack on DC and NYC is worth some lines of type.
_____
Milton Viorst wrote a fascinating article “The Education of Ali Al-Timimi” that appeared in The Atlantic Monthly, June 2006.
The Mason Gazette in “Mason to Pursue Advanced Biodefense Research” on November 17, 2000 had announced:”The School of Computational Sciences (SCS) and Advanced Biosystems, Inc., a subsidiary of Hadron, Inc., of Alexandria, are pursuing a collaborative program at the Prince William Campus to enhance research and educational objectives in biodefense research. The article noted that the program was funded primarily by a grant awarded to Advanced Biosystems from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
Ali Al-Timimi worked at George Mason University’s Discovery Hall throughout 2000 and 2002 period (The Hawali/Timimi October 6, 2002 letter drafted by Al-Timimi was hand delivered to every member of the US Congress just before their vote authorizing the use of force against Iraq, warning of the disastrous consequences that would follow an invasion of Iraq.) Dr. Timimi’s defense committee explained on their website:
“Because Dr. Al-Timimi felt that he did not have enough stature to send a letter in his name on behalf of Muslims, he contacted Dr. Al-Hawali among others to send the letter. Dr. Al-Hawali agreed and sent a revised version which Dr. Al-Timimi then edited and had hand delivered to every member of Congress.”
In addition to the lucidly written October 6, 2002 letter , Hawali had sent a lengthy, convoluted October 15, 2001 “Open Letter” to President Bush in which he had rejoiced in the 9/11 attacks.
Bin Laden had referred to Sheik al-Hawali in his 1996 declaration of war on America. Prior to the 1998 embassy bombings, Ayman’s London cell sent letters to three different media outlets in Europe claiming responsibility for the bombings and referring to Hawali’s imprisonment. In two of the letters, the conditions laid out as to how the violence would stop were (1) release of Sheik Hawali (who along with another had been imprisoned in Saudi Arabia in 1994) and (2) the release of blind sheik Abdel Rahman (who had been imprisoned in connection with WTC 1993). Hawali was released in 1999 after he agreed to stop advocating against the Saudi regime and agreed to limit himself to urging the destruction of the United States and Israel.
Former USAMRIID head and Ames researcher Bailey coinvented, with Ken Alibek, the process to treat cell culture with hydrophobic silicon dioxide so as to permit greater concentration upon drying. He was in Room 156B of GMU’s Discovery Hall. at the Center for Biodefense. The patent application was filed March 14, 2001. Rm 154A was Victor Morozov’s room number when he first assumed Timimi’s phone number in 2004 (and before he moved to the newly constructed Bull Run Hall). Morozov was the co-inventor with Dr. Bailey of the related cell culture process under which the silica was removed from the spore surface — but with the silicon still detectable by an EDX by reason of having been absorbed by the exosporium.
Instead of starting a center from scratch, GMU chose to join forces with Dr. Alibek and Dr. Bailey’s existing research firm, Hadron Advanced Biosystems Inc., which was already working under contract for the federal government, having received funding from DARPA. Dr. Alibek told the Washington Post that he and Bailey had spent their careers studying an issue that only recently grabbed the country’s attention, after the anthrax mailings the previous fall. Dr. Bailey and Alibek met in 1991, when a delegation of Soviet scientists visited the USAMRIID at Ft. Detrick. Dr. Bailey explained that the purpose of the tour was to show the Soviets that the US was not developing offensive biological weapons. Bailey said he tried to engage Alibek in conversation but Alibek remained aloof. Alibek, for his part, explains that he was suspicious of this American smiling so broadly at him. A year later, Alibek would defect to the US and reveal an illegal biological program in the Soviet Union of a staggering scope. Alibek says that one reason he defected was that he realized that the Soviet intelligence was wrong — that the US research was in fact only defensive.
In Saudi Arabia, Al-Timimi had been mentored by a Saudi-trained Canadian imam Bilal Philips. Philips was Al-Timimis Islamic Studies teacher at Manaret Riyadh High School in the early 1980s. Al-Timimi adopted Philips’ view that The clash of civilizations is a reality, and Western culture led by the United States is an enemy of Islam. Between 1991 and 1993, Philips relocated to the Mindinao, Philippines, where he taught at an islamic school. In 1993, according to an interview he gave in a London-based Arabic-language magazine interview, Philips ran a program to convert US soldiers to Islam stationed in Saudi Arabia during the first Persian Gulf War. Philips was made a proselytization official by the Saudi Air Force. Philips followed up in the US, with telephone calls and visits intended to recruit the veterans as potential members of Bin Laden’s network. He enlisted assistance from others based in the U.S. and members of Islamic centers all over the US. These conversion specialists financed pilgrimages for US veterans and would later send Muslim clerics in the United States to their homes. Bilal Philips encouraged some converts from this program to fight in Bosnia in the 1990s. He enlisted WTC plotter Clement Rodney Hampton-El to help him with the program. Hampton-El was associated with the Al-Kifah center in Brooklyn. Hampton-El in trial testimony described a meeting at the Saudi embassy in 1992 at which Philips gave him a list of US Army personnel to approach. Bilal Philips was named along with Osama bin Laden and Bin Laden brother-in-law Khalifa as unindicted co-conspirators in the Day of Terror trial that sent the “blind sheik” to prison.
It is a small world and the salafists in the US who travelled tended to know each other. Bilal Philips was a good friend of Adnan El-Shukrijumah’s father. Philips wrote in his guestbook on the family website his son created about learning Arabic: “He was one of my first teachers in Arabic and is a dear friend, though geography and world politics has separated us. Tell him that, as always, I love him for the sake of Allaah. Was salaam, Bilal. Adnan’s family website also contained a picture of another unindicted co-conspirator of the 93 bombing, Siraj Wahhaj, who would speak as the same Falls Church mosque as Al-Timimi.
After completing his religious education in Saudi Arabia in Medina, Ali Al Timimi had returned to the United States and received a second bachelor’s degree — this time in computer science at the University of Maryland, while also studying software programming at George Washington University. Timimi spoke at IANA conferences in 1993 and 1994. A senior al Qaeda recruiter, Abdelrahman Dosari, also spoke at three IANA conferences in the early 1990s. In December 1993, Al-Dorsari (a.k.a. Shaykh Abu Abdel Aziz “Barbaros”) spoke on ‘Jihad & Revival” and exhorted young men to fight for their faith as Al-Timimi would later be accused of doing privately with young men in Virginia. In 1995 Ali Al Timimi headed an Islamic Assembly of North America (”IANA”) delegation to China together with IANA President Bassem Khafagi and Syracuse oncologist and IANA Vice Chairman Rhafil Dhafir. The IANA condemned the UN women’s rights conference as “an attack on Islam.” They urged Imams worldwide to tell Muslims about “the hidden agenda of this UN Conference, and how to foil the libertine and Westernization movements in the Islamic world.”
During his trip to China, Al-Timimi had a day off so he decided to take a tour of Beijing. One landmark he visited was the Forbidden City. It was part of the Chinese capital where the kings of China would reside. If someone tried to enter without permission, they would be executed. Timimi noticed that all the script (Mongolian) was written in Arabic letters. He told one audience:
“It seems that the Chinese rulers of some 600 or 700 years ago would write their names, their dynasty, their ideas, their philosophies in the Arabic script. Why? Because the Islamic civilization was the dominant culture of the time. The Muslims were the dominant people on earth. Now as you make your way through the Forbidden City and you go through different additions to the palace, new buildings appear and with it the centuries are changing. What happens the Arabic script disappears. Until finally when you come to Tinammen Square, the central area in Beijing; you find all the signs are in Chinese and English. Why? Because Western civilization, and specifically the British and now the Americans are the dominant culture in the world.”
One author, the father of a boy who knew Al-Timimi as young teen, wrote: “Dozens of his talks are available on the Internet in text and in audio format. They contain little about Arab concerns with the Arab-Israeli wars, the rivalries between the Arab states, the problems faced by Muslims living in the West, or even the war in Iraq. Rather, they reveal a man who reflects deeply on the Islamic vision of Judgment day, prophecy, the nature of the divine, and fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) — subjects with which he grappled in Medina and in his private reading.” Al Timimi’s lectures (in English after Arabic opening) include “The Negative Portrayal Of Islam In the Media,” “Signs Before the Day of Judgement,” “Advice to the UK Salafis” and “Crusade Complex: Western Perceptions of Islam.”
Al-Timimi’s increasing computer skills got him a job at SRA International where Ali worked as a “bioinformatics software architect” providing information technology to the government. Some of his jobs required that Ali obtain a high-level security clearance. One job resulted in a letter of recommendation from the White House. He then enrolled in a PhD program in computational biology at George Mason University.
By 2000, Ali Al-Timimi was already taking advanced courses at Mason in computational sciences. Timimi once explained his research: “I am currently a research scientist at the Center for Biomedical Genomics and Informatics, George Mason University. I am involved in the analysis of the microarray data generated by the CTRF Cancer Genomics Project (http://www.ctrf-cagenomics.vcu.edu/HOMEPAGE.htm). Likewise, I am developing new computational approaches and technologies in support of this project.” The webpage for Timimi’s program at the time explained: “Faculty members and graduate students in the Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology participate in numerous collaborative efforts including but not limited to the following Laboratories and Research Centers: Center for Biomedical Genomics and Informatics (GMU) , Laboratory for Microbial and Environmental Biocomplexity (GMU) and Center for Biodefense (GMU) Beginning the Spring of 2002. GMU hired Ali to develop a computer program that coordinated the research at several universities, letting him go only after he came under suspicion by the FBI. In Spring 2002, according to salary information obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, GMU hired him for $70,000 a year. In 2002, the employment was through the School of Computational Sciences and in 2003, it was through Life Sciences Grants & Contracts.
The School of Computational Sciences at George Mason is a joint venture between the American Type Culture Collection (”ATCC”) and George Mason. The joint venture is an effort to maximize research efforts by combining the academic and applied approaches to research. The School’s first activity was to teach an ATCC course in DNA techniques adapted for George Mason students. The ATCC is an internationally renown non-profit organization that houses the world’s largest and most diverse archive of biological materials. The Prince William Campus shares half of Discovery Hall with ATCC. ATCC moved to its current state-of-the-art laboratory at Discovery Hall (Prince Willam II) in 1998. ATCC’s 106,000-square-foot facility has nearly 35,000 square feet of laboratory space with a specialized air handling system and Biosafety Level 2 and 3 containment stations. The ATCC bioinformatics (BIF) program carries out research in various areas of biological information management relevant to its mission. BIF scientists interact with laboratory scientists in microbiology, cell biology, and molecular biology at ATCC and other laboratories throughout the world. ATCC has strong collaborations with a large number of academic institutions, including computational sciences at George Mason University. Through these partnerships, the George Mason Prince William Campus offers George Mason microbiology students an opportunity for students to be involved in current research and gain access to facilities and employment opportunities at ATCC and other partner companies. While I’ve not yet found any reference directly confirming Timimi’s room number, the person who inherited his old telephone number (3-4294) is Victor Morozov in the Center for Biodefense, who upon joining the faculty and inheriting the phone number was in Rm. 154A, very near Dr. Bailey in Rm 156B. GMU Information Services helpfully looked up the listings from 2001 directory. As of October 2001 (when the directory is published according to GMU Information Services), judging from the directory, Al-Timimi was still just a graduate student.
One ATCC former employee felt so strongly about lax security there the scientist called me out of the blue and said that the public was overlooking the patent repository as a possible source of the Ames strain. ATCC does not deny they had virulent Ames in their patent repository pre 9/11 (as distinguished from their online catalog). The spokesperson emailed me: “As a matter of policy, ATCC does not disclose information on the contents of its patent depository...”
Al-Timimi was on an advisory board member of Assirat al-Mustaqueem, an international Arabic language magazine that published out of Pittsburgh. Assirat, produced in Pittsburgh beginning in 1991, was the creation of a group of North American muslims, many of whom were senior members of IANA. Its Advisory Committee included Bassem Khafagi and Ali Al-Timimi. Two staff members who wrote for Assirat then joined IANA’s staff when it folded in 2000. They had been members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and were activists in the movement. One of the former EIJ members, Gamal Sultan, was the editor of the quarterly IANA magazine in 2002. Mr. Sultan’s brother Mahmoud wrote for Assirat also. The most prominent writer was the founder of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Kamal Habib. He led the Egyptian Islamic Jihad at the time of Anwar Sadat’s assassination when young doctor Zawahiri’s cell merged with a few other cells to form the EIJ. Two writers for Assirat in Pittsburgh had once shared a Portland, Oregon address with Al Qaeda member Wadih El-Hage who served a Bin Laden’s “personal secretary.”
Kamal Habib had been a founding member of Egyptian Islamic Jihad and had spent 10 years in jail for the assassination of Anwar Sadat. In the late 1970s, the cell run by the young doctor Zawahiri joined with three other groups to become Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ) under Habib’s leadership. After a visit in 2000, Gamal Sultan said Pittsburgh was known as the “American Kandahar,” given its rolling hills. Besides forming the Islah (”’Reform) party wth Gamal Sultan, Mr. Kamal Habib contributed to Al Manar al Jadeed, IANA’s quarterly journal. The pair sought the blind sheik’s endorsement of their political party venture in March 1999 — although they were not seeking the official participation of organizations like the Egyptian Islamic Jihad or the Egyptian Islamic Group, they were hoping the groups would not oppose it. The pair wanted members of the movement to be free to join in peaceful partisan activity. They were not deterred when the blind sheik responded that the project was pointless, at the same he withdrew his support for the cease-fire initiative that had been backed by the imprisoned leaders of the Egyptian Islamic Group.
In early April 2001, Nawaf Alhazmi and Hani Hanjour rented an apartment in Falls Church, Virginia, for about a month, with the assistance of a man they met at the mosque. Nawaf Al-Hazmi had been at the January 2000 meeting at Yazid Sufaat’s Malaysian condominium in January 2000. The hijackers attended sermons at the Dar al Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, where Al-Timimi was located until he established the nearby center. The FBI reports that at an imam who had recently also moved from San Diego had closed door meetings with hijackers Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar in 2000 while all three of them were living in San Diego. Police later find the phone number of the Falls Church mosque when they searched the apartment of 9/11 planner Ramzi bin al-Shibh in Germany.
Yusuf Wells, who was a fundraiser for the Benevolence International Foundation, visited Northern Virginia over the April 14-15, 2001 weekend. The previous month he had been at Iowa State on a similar visit. On April 15, 2001, he was brought to a paintball game. In the second season, they had become more secretive and an inquiry by an FBI Special Agent was made in 2000 of one of the members about the games. Part of BIF fundraiser Wells’ job involved writing reports about his fund raising trips. In his April 15, 2001 report he writes:
“I was taken on a trip to the woods where a group of twenty brothers get together to play Paintball. It is a very secret and elite group and as I understand it, it is an honor to be invited to come. The brothers are fully geared up in camouflage fatigues, facemasks, and state of the art paintball weaponry. They call it ‘training’ and are very serious about it. I knew at least 4 or 5 of them were ex US military, the rest varied.
Most all of them young men between the ages of 17-35. I was asked by the amir of the group to give a talk after Thuhr prayer. I spoke about seeing the conditions of Muslims overseas while with BIF, and how the fire of Islam is still very much alive in the hearts of the people even in the midst of extreme oppression. I also stressed the idea of being balanced. That we should not just be jihadis and perfect our fighting skills, but we should also work to perfect our character and strengthen our knowledge of Islam. I also said that Muslims are not just book reading cowards either, and that they should be commended for forming such a group.
Many were confused as to why I had been ‘trusted’ to join the group so quickly, but were comforted after my brief talk. Some offered to help me get presentations on their respective localities.”
Al-Timimi was not friends with the Virginia defendants — at least he did not regularly associate with them outside his classes they attended. But they were awed by Timimi, a man who could both translate 7th-century Koranic Arabic, talk about astrobiology with friends, or joke about the Redskins. The prosecutor argued that the paintball defendants “couldn’t figure out how to tie their shoelaces without asking al-Timimi.” The group looked up to Al-Timimi and sought his advice on all sorts of questions — to include whether it was permissible to pray in a moving car and whether one could cut short his prayers due to an approaching scorpion.
After 9/11, although a dinner that night was cancelled in light of the events of the day, Al-Timimi sought “to organize a plan in case of anti-Muslim backlash and to get the brothers together.” The group got together on September 16. Al-Timimi when he came in told the group to turn of their phones, unplug the answering machine, and pull down the curtains. Al-Timimi told the group that Mullah Omar had called upon Muslims to defend Afghanistan. Al-Timimi read parts of the al-Uqla fatwa to the group gave the fatwa to Khan with the instructions to burn it after he has read it. Al Timimi said the duty to engage in jihad is “fard ayn” — an individual duty of all Muslims. Over a lunch, Al-Timimi with two of the group, Al-Timimi told them not to carry anything suspicious and if they were stopped on the way to Pakistan to ask for their mother and cry like a baby. He told them to carry a magazine. The next day the pair left for Pakistan. The group from the September 16 meeting met again in early October, and a number left for Pakistan immediately after that meeting.
In 2001, Al-Timimi kept the personal papers of IANA President Khafagi at his home for safekeeping. His taped audio lecturers were among the most popular at the charity Islamic Assembly of North America in Ann Arbor, Michigan. He knew its President, Khafagi, both through work with CAIR and IANA. Al Timimi was close to his former teacher Safar al Hawali, the dissident Saudi sheik who once close to Osama bin Laden and whose writings hail what he calls the inevitable downfall of the West. Al Hawali has played a public role in mediating between Saudi militants and the government. Al-Timimi sought to represent and explain the views of radical sheik Al-Hawali in a letter he sent to members of Congress. The same nondescript office building at 360 S. Washington St. in Falls Church where Timimi used to lecture at Dar al Arqam housed the Muslim World League.
Journalist Bill Gertz, in his book Breakdown: How America’s Intelligence Failures Led to September 11 (2002) explains the central importance of al-Hawali:
“bin Laden was ecstatic about the attack [on Khobar towers in 1995], according to intelligence sources. Bin Laden ordered an assistant to telephone ... a Saudi dissident based in London, who ran the Committee for the Defense of Legitimate Rights. “You remember when the first ‘accident’ occurred. Now the second has occurred. More is coming.” Bin Laden then told [him], “Let them keep our friend Safar al-Hawali in prison as he will good news very soon. We are working on getting him out.”
Their friend, Safar al-Hawali, a Saudi cleric, had been arrested and jailed by the Saudi government in 1994 for antigovernment activities. He is considered a spiritual godfather to bin Laden and his cohorts. Hawali is part of the extremist Salafi branch of the already extreme sect of Wahhabi Islam. Hawali would be released, and by October 2001, he had become a university lecturer living in Islam’s holy city of Mecca and a public criticism of President George W. Bush’s war on terrorism.
But that was for the future. On the day of the Dhahran bombing, bin Laden received another telephone call. This call was from one of his closest associates in terror, the leader of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Ayman al-Zawahiri, who asked about the bombing. Al-Zawahiri offered his congratulations to bin Laden for the successful attack.”
The FBI first contacted Timimi shortly after 9/11. He met with FBI agents 7 or 8 times in the months leading up to his arrest. Al-Timimi is a US citizen born in Washington DC His house was searched, his passport taken and his telephone monitored. Some of his communications with Sheik Safar al-Hawali, one of the two fundamentalist sheikhs who were friends of Bin Laden, were intercepted. Al-Hawali, was one of the original incorporators of Mercy International. Mercy, as a front for Al Qaeda, was deeply involved in planning the 1998 embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. The two radical sheiks had been imprisoned from 1994-1999. Ali Al Timimi defended his PhD thesis in computational biology shortly after his indictment for recruiting young men to fight the US.
Upon his indictment, in September 2004, al-Timimi explained he had been offered a plea bargain of 14 years, but he declined. He quoted Sayyid Qutb. He said he remembered “reading his books and loving his teaching” as a child, and that Qutb’s teaching was prevented from signing something that was false by “the finger that bears witness.” He noted that he and his lawyers asked that authorities hold off the indictment until he had received his PhD, but said that unfortunately they did not wait.
The indictment against the paintball defendants alleged that at an Alexandria, Virginia residence, in the presence of a representative of BIF, the defendants watched videos depicting Mujahadeen engaged in Jihad and discussed a training camp in Bosnia. His defense lawyer says that the FBI searched the townhouse of “to connect him to the 9/11 attacks or to schemes to unleash a biological or nuclear attack.” Famed head of the former Russian bioweaponeering program Ken Alibek told me that he would occasionally see him in the hallways at George Mason, where they both were in the microbiology department, and was vaguely aware that he was an islamic hardliner. When what his defense counsel claims was an FBI attempt to link him to a planned biological attack failed, defense counsel says that investigators focused on his connections to the men who attended his lectures at the local Falls Church, Va. In the end, he was indicted just for inciting them to go to Afghanistan to defend the Taliban against the United States. During deliberations, he reportedly was very calm, reading Genome Technology and other scientific journals. He was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment plus 70 years.
At the same time the FBI was searching the townhouse of PhD candidate Ali Timimi, searches and arrests moved forward elsewhere. In Moscow, Idaho, FBI agents interviewed Nabil Albaloushi. (They apparently searched his apartment at the same time they searched the apartment of IANA webmaster Sami al-Hussayen, who they had woken from bed at 4:00 a.m.) Albaloushi was a PhD candidate expert in drying foodstuffs. His thesis in 2003 was 350 pages filled with charts of drying coefficients. Interceptions showed a very close link between IANA’s Sami al-Hussayen and Sheikh al-Hawali, to include the setting up of web sites, the providing of vehicles for extended communication, and telephone contact with intermediaries of Sheikh al-Hawali. Al-Hussayen had al-Hawali’s phone number upon the search of his belongings upon his arrest. Former Washington State University animal geneticist and nutrition researcher Ismail Diab, who had moved to Syracuse to work for an IANA-spin-off, also was charged in Syracuse and released as a material witness to a financial investigation of the IANA affiliate “Help The Needy.” After the government failed to ask Dr. Diab any questions for nearly 3 months, the magistrate bail restrictions and removed the electronic monitoring and curfew requirements.
In Moscow, Idaho, the activities by IANA webmaster Sami al-Hussayen that drew scrutiny involved these same two radical sheiks. U.S. officials say the two sheiks influenced al Qaeda’s belief that Muslims should wage holy war against the U.S. until it ceases to support Israel and withdraws from the Middle East. Sami Hussayen, who was acquitted, made numerous calls and wrote many e-mails to the two clerics, sometimes giving advice to them about running Arabic-language Web sites on which they espoused their anti-Western views.
George Mason University, Department Listings, accessed August 17, 2003, shows that the National Center For Biodefense and Center for Biomedical Genomics had the same mail stop (MS 4ES). The most famed bioweaponeer in the world — the former head of the Russian bioweapons program (to include anthrax ) — was not far from this sheik urging violent jihad in an apocalyptic struggle between religions. Dr. Alibek’s office was Rm. 156D in Prince William 2. The groups both shared the same department fax of 993-4288. Dr. Alibek advises me he had seen him several times in the corridors of GMU and was told that he was a religious muslim hard-liner but knew nothing of his activities. At one point, Timimi’s mail drop was MSN 4D7
??????????????????????????? Charles Bailey at 3-4271 was the former head of USAMRIID and joined the Center in April 2001. He continued to do research with Ames after 9/11. Dr. Alibek reports that shortly after the mailings, he wrote Director Mueller and offered his services but was advised that they already had assembled a large group.
Ali Al Timimi had the same telephone number that Dr. Victor Morozov, of the Center for Biodefense would later have when he joined the faculty and occupied the newly constructed Bull Run Building, which opened in late 2004 (Rm. #362). If only to show the sophisticated cutting edge work they do at the Center, Dr. Morozov focuses on the development of new bioassay methods for express analysis, high-throughput screening and proteomics. He has recently developed a new electrospray-based technology for mass fabrication of protein microarrays. Dr. Morozov is currently supervising a DOE -funded research project directed at the development of ultra-sensitive express methods for detection of pathogens in which slow diffusion of analytes is replaced by their active transport controlled and powered by external forces (electric, magnetic, gravitational or hydrodynamic). His homepage explains that: “A variety of projects are available for students to participate in 1. Develop methods for active capturing of viruses and cells. 2. AFM imaging of macromolecules, viruses and cells. 3. Develop active immunoassay. 4. Analyze forces operating in the active assay of biomolecules and viral particles. 5. Develop immobilization techniques for antibodies and other biospecific molecules. 6. Study crystallization dynamics and morphology of organic and inorganic crystals in the presence of protein impurities. 7. Develop software to analyze motion of beads. 8. Develop software to analyze patterns in drying droplets. 9. Develop an electrostatic collector for airborne particles.”
Al-Timimi obtained a doctorate from George Mason University in 2004 in the field of computational biology — a field related to cancer research involving genome sequencing. He successfully defended his thesis 5 weeks after his indictment. Curt Jamison, Timimi’s thesis advisor and coauthor was in Prince William II (Discovery Hall) Rm. 181A. The staff of Advanced Biosystems was in Rm. 160, 162, 177, 254E and several others. Computational sciences offices were intermixed among the Hadron personnel on the first floor of Prince William II to include 159, 161, 166A, 167, 181 B and 181C. Rm. 156B was Charles Bailey, former commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, who was head of the Center for Biodefense. Defense contractor Hadron had announced the appointment Dr. Charles Bailey as Vice-President of Advanced Biosystems in early April 2001. Over 13 years, he had served as a Research Scientist, Deputy Commander for Research, Deputy Commander and Commander at the U.S. Army Medical Research Instiute. As a USAMRIID scientist, he designed and supervised the construction of BL-3 containment facilities. His hands-on experience with a wide variety of pathogens is chronicled in 70 published articles. During his 4 years with the Defense Intelligence Agency, he published numerous articles assessing foreign capabilities regarding biological weapons.” When I asked Dr. Bailey to confirm Al-Timimi’s room number relative to his own, his only response was to refer me to University counsel. Counsel then never responded to my inquiry regarding their respective room numbers. Dr. Jamison never responded to an emailed query either.
In Fall 2001, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (”AFIP”) had detected silicon dioxide (silica) in the attack anthrax — with a characteristic big spike for the silicon. The reason for the silicon dioxide/silica claimed to have been detected by AFIP has never been explained (and it’s been nearly a half decade). No silica was observable on the SEMS images that Dr. Alibek and Dr. Matthew Meselson saw. The Daschle product was “pure spores.” But while the spores were not coated with silica, wasn’t silicon dioxide used as part of a microdroplet cell culture process used prior to drying to permit greater concentration? As explained in a later related patent, the silica could be removed from the surface of the spore through repeated centrifugaton or an air chamber.
Dr. Alibek and the former head of USAMRIID, Ames anthrax research Charles Bailey, had filed a patent application in mid-March 2001 involving a microdroplet cell culture technique that used silicon dioxide in a method for concentrating growth of cells. The patent was granted and the application first publicly disclosed in the Spring of 2002. Weren’t the SEMS images and AFIP EDX finding both consistent with use of this process in growing the culture? It’s been suggested informally that perhaps the silicon analytical peak was more likely due to silanol from hydrolysis of a silane, used in siliconizing glassware. But didn’t the AFIP in fact also detect oxygen in ratios characteristic of silicon dioxide? Wasn’t the scientist, now deceased, who performed the EDX highly experienced and expert in detecting silica? Hasn’t the AFIP always stood by its report, in which it explained: “AFIP experts utilized an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (an instrument used to detect the presence of otherwise-unseen chemicals through characteristic wavelengths of X-ray light) to confirm the previously unidentifiable substance as silica?” The nuance that was lost — or just never publicly explained for very sound reasons — was that silica was used in the cell culture process and then removed from the spores through a process such as centrifugation.
Dr. Morozov is co-inventor along with Dr. Bailey for a patent “Cell Culture” that explains how the silicon dioxide can be removed from the surface. Perhaps it is precisely this AFIP finding of silicon dioxide (without silica on the SEMS) that is why the FBI came to suspect Al-Timimi in 2003 (rightly or wrongly, we don’t know). The FBI would have kept these scientific findings secret to protect the integrity of the confidential criminal/national security investigation. There was still a processor and mailer to catch — still a case to prove. Above all, they needed to protect the due process rights of Al-Timimi while he defended himself on other charges.
Al-Timimi sent out a February 1, 2003 email in Arabic containing an article that said:
“There is no doubt Muslims were overjoyed because of the adversity that befell their greatest enemy. The Columbia crash made me feel, and God is the only One to know, that this is a strong signal that Western Supremacy (especially that of America) that began 500 years ago is coming to a quick end, God willing, as occurred to the shuttle.”
The authorities had an interest in a lecture by dissident Saudi Sheik al-Hawali upon a search on February 26, 2003 of an IANA-connected scientist in Syracuse, New York. A federal magistrate, however, found that we had not reached the point where such reading material would be a reason for denial of bail.
Last year, FBI microbiologist Dr. Doug Beecher commented in a publication that it undermines biodefense preparations to underestimate the danger of simple spore preparations. He provided me a copy when I wrote him as the designated corresponding author and then I distributed it to reporters. The paper had been reviewed by Professor Meselson at Harvard. Dr. Beecher is right that there is no reason to view it as akin to “militarization” or requiring state sponsorship. The two sentences by Beecher actually did not address the issue at all. They just go to illustrate and confirm Dr. Alibek’s point that a sophisticated product can result from a relatively simple method. Here, the government even allowed the method to be commercialized and be published in the public domain for use in a broad range of possible commercial applications. Perhaps the United States biodefense establishment should not let officials commercialize and disclose such dual use technology, whether the patent is assigned to a DARPA-funded program or not — and whether deemed “biofriendly” or not. (The patent, which is not classified, has been assigned to George Mason University). Everyone is basically right in substantial part—Richard Ebright, Milton Leitenberg, Gary Matsumoto, Stuart Jacobson, France Boyle, Matthew Meselson, Richard Spertzel, Cliff Kincaid, Barbara Rosenberg, Ed Lake, Richard Smith and many others who have long held strong and divergent opinions of what had been published in the media or what they knew. But it turns out that they apparently have just been seeing the elephant in the living room from a different angle. Actually, they’ve just been in a position to see the elephant’s rump from outside the living room door.
In a November 30, 2004 letter of appeal circulated in sympathetic circles in the US and the UK, Bilal Philips encouraged Muslims to assist Al-Timimi financially, morally or politically. The letter urged that whatever the charges against him [Al-Timimi] may be, from an Islamic perspective they are false and contrived in order to silence the Dawah to correct Islam.
In a June 2005 interview in a Swiss (German language) weekly news magazine, Neue Zurcher Zeitung, Ken Alibek addresses the anthrax mailings:
A. “...What if I told you Swiss scientists are paid by Al Qaeda? You could believe it or not. It has become somewhat fashionable to disparage Russian scientists. Americans, Iraqis, or whoever could just as well be involved with Al Qaeda. Why doesn’t anyone speculate about that?”
Q. “But could one of your students build a biological weapon in the garage?”
A. “Let me reply philosophically: Two hundred years ago, it was unthinkable to believe that people would be using mobile telephones, wasn’t it? Everything changes. Our knowledge grows, and technology develops incredibly quickly. These days even high-school kids can breed recombinant microbial strains. I am not saying that a student is in a position to build a biological weapon all by himself. But the knowledge needed to do it is certainly there.”
No one who responded to my inquiries ever knew Al-Timimi to ever have been involved in any biodefense project. For example, former Russian bioweaponeer Sergei Popov did not know of any such work by Al-Timimi, and Anna Popova had only seen him in the hall on a very rare occasion. Dr. Alibek thought of him as a “numbers guy” rather than a hands-on type. Given that the FBI knows what Al-Timimi had for dinner on September 16, 2001, it is very likely that the past years have involved a continued search for the mailer and/or processor. His attorney emphasizes that while they searched for materials related to a planned biological attack when they searched his townhouse in late February 2003, they came up empty.
At his sentencing, Dr. Al-Timimi spoke in clear and measured tones:
“I will not admit guilt nor seek the Courts mercy. I do this not out of any disrespect to the Court. I do this simply because I am innocent.
My claim of innocence is not because of any inherent misunderstanding on my part as to the nature of the crimes for which I was convicted nor is it because my Muslim belief recognizes sharia rather than secular law. It is merely because I am innocent. ...
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
I declare the governments recitation poor as it stripped those words of their meaning.
***
Imprisonment of any term, as this Court well knows, is a crisis for the incarcerated and his or her loved ones. I am no exception to that.
But the real crisis brought on my imprisonment, I sincerely believe is Americas. For if my conviction is to stand, it would mean that two hundred and thirty years of Americas tradition of protecting the individual from the tyrannies and whims of the sovereign will have come to an end. And that which is exploited today to persecute a single member of a minority will most assuredly come back to haunt the majority tomorrow.”
Dr. Timimi has very substantial pending appeals relating to warrantless wiretapping and the First Amendment. Dr. Timimi’s attorney likely is understandably annoyed that they keep moving Al-Timimi between prisons.
KSM invoked George Washington in his statement to a military tribunal in March 2007. That was far less compelling because he was admitting to many serious crimes. Dr. Al-Timimi, on the other hand, was guilty of nothing other than exhorting some young men to go abroad and defend their faith. It seems that his only crime was to put his religion before his nation-state. He was sentenced to life in prison plus 70 years. As one Washington Post reporter said of such cases, the government seems to be engaged in shadow boxing.
As Al-Timimi explained in his eloquent statement upon sentencing, he was convicted out of fear.
The former head of the DARPA Biological Counermeasures Program, Dr. Stephen S. Morse, who oversaw the funding of programs such as at the GMU Center for Biodefense, in an interview airing on Charlie Rose on October 10, 2001, explained that there was no need for the public to fear. He noted that maybe the mailer had a personal reason — no reason to assume the Florida death related to terrorism or a large group. Dr. Morse urged that we put it into perspective and inform the public so as to remove the mystery. He explained we should not allow ourselves to feel fear . As reiterated in other interviews that week, he said mailed anthrax was not a great danger.
As those words aired, more letters were en route from that mailbox at 10 Nassau St. in Princeton. The anthrax mailer asked a pointed question in the letter containing a much more highly refined product — product that aerosolized much more readily. The new batch of letters asked: “Are you afraid?”
The answer was clearly yes.
Conclusion
Dr. Zawahiri appears to have accomplished the attack on the US “structure” he intended. With the planes, Al Qaeda struck the US trade dominance (World Trade Center) and its military might (Pentagon). With the anthrax, some US-based supporter(s) of the goals of Zawahiri appear to have rounded out the field that they imagine provides support to Israel — the legislative branch and media. Analogous letter bombs were sent in connection with the earlier attack on the World Trade Center and the imprisonment of the Blind Sheikh and militant islamists responsible for that attack and a related plot. Thus, relying on the postal service to send its deadly missives in connection with an earlier attack of the World Trade Center is not only Al Qaeda’s modus operandi, it is its signature.
Everyone approaches a problem from their world view and what they know. A hammer tends to find a nail. Biological weapons control activists see a US biodefense insider. Anti-semites see Zionist perpetrators. US-haters see a CIA conspiracy. The CIA’s Zawahiri Task Force sees a US-based supporter of the militant islamists (at least they do if they are smart). Israeli intelligence and the Iraqi National Congress lobbied for Iraq as the culprit. Liberal Beltway insiders see right-wing wackos. FBI investigators would seem to be covering all the possible leads, leaving no stone unturned. Journalists kowtow to the views of any government source in the investigation they deem reliable. Sometimes if a spokesman for Al Qaeda claims it has green-lighted highly-educated US-based supporters of the militant islamists who have access to United States government and intelligence information relating to biological weapons — supporters who are “above suspicion” — then the spokesman may be telling the truth. Sometimes if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.
Information relating to the resolution of the Amerithrax matter likely will come from the numerous individuals, now arrested, who may have played a role or known something. It likely will stem from those with a personal knowledge of Al Qaeda, and not those with an ideological or political axe to grind, whether against Iraq or militant islamists, or against the US biodefense establishment or current federal Administration. The perp may at some point have expressed upset at the detention of the Blind Sheik or been personally affected by the detention of friends or family.
Although the analysis by the Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) in Rockville, Md. did not pinpoint the exact origin of the Florida isolate, the study showed how whole-genome sequencing technology and computational methods can be a powerful approach for analyzing anthrax and other bacterial outbreaks. Similarly, while the anthrax perpetrator(s) may never be caught, the Amerithrax investigation was hard fought by investigators who realized that the next 9/11 might be at issue. As they heard Ayman Zawahiri’s recurring threats of attack, the Amerithrax investigators likely remained haunted by coincidences that they tirelessly pursued while they left no stone unturned. Amerithrax investigators emphasize that there is no cover-up — no conspiracy. The investigators are under intense pressure to solve the case. The information being withheld is for reasons of national security and safeguarding the integrity of the confidential criminal investigation.
If the mailings were done by a US biodefense insider motivated to increase biodefense funding or sound an alarm, it necessarily was done by someone who was in a position — access to intelligence relating to threat assessment — who could do a damn good job at making it look like US-based supporters of Ayman Zawahiri were responsible. The person needed access not only to matters relating to technical issues, but needed to know code used by Al Qaeda operatives including Ayman himself in a letter to followers in May 2001. In profiling a murder, Occam’s Razor counsels that we favor the theory where there is documentary evidence of an intent to commit murder by the use of weaponized anthrax in retaliation for the rendering of EIJ leaders.
DARPA did not frame EIJ. EIJ framed DARPA.
Good job, Ed...have a great evening. :)
I've located images of 4 different versions of the treat letter. I also do a brief analysis of the handwriting.
While it's clear that the letters were NOT written by the same person who wrote the anthrax letters, it still seems that the motivation was similar: The culprit wants people to think that al Qaeda is about to launch another attack.
Hey, maybe Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff is the culprit! I just heard him not very many days ago say that he had a gut feeling Al Qaeda was preparing to launch another attack against us.
Could be. ;-) But more likely it's just someone who has access to The Gale Directory of Publications. In fact, someone just sent me an e-mail suggesting that.
Yes, I know all the addresses are probably available on the Internet, but it seems far more likely that those small newspapers were identified as a result of experience with contacting newspapers of all sizes - and such a person would be working from a LIST of some kind.
I was expecting it today. But I just checked the Docket and there's nothing new there.
I'm assuming that Judge Walton is spending a lot of time on gathering together precedents and citations to back up his ruling. And a lot of proof-reading may be going on. So, I don't expect he'll just issue a simple one-page ruling.
My best guess now is that he'll issue the Order sometime early next week. But that's still just a guess. Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com
Create the perfect conspiracy theory
Pick your adversary
A sense of anomie (dislocation from society and authority) fuels beliefs in conspiracy theories, so pick a big bad organisation of some sort - government or big business is ideal
The government is ideal. "They're always up to no good."
For added spice, identify a shadowy, secretive society with implied links to your adversary: the more shadowy, the better
The FBI and the CIA are ideal villains.
Choose your event
You'll need a big, contemporary newsworthy event around which to weave your theory
The anthrax attacks of 2001 are perfect.
If it's a sudden, shocking visual occurrence of international import it is more likely to become a "flashbulb memory" for the masses. Your key conspiracy audience, most able to create such vivid "indelible" memories will be between the ages of 20 and 35
Develop your story
Construct your theory from carefully selected information that weaves together into a compelling story
If something doesn't fit, reinterpret it in line with your theory
As we've seen in this thread, the two sentences above are TrebelRebel's forte. He uses arguments like the "failure to reverse engineer the attack anthrax" as if it were true, even though it has been shown to be totally FALSE. He totally relies upon some nonsense in an idiotic AFIP newsletter over any number of contradicting scientific observations and scientific publications.
Create uncertainty: question existing evidence or find new evidence that contradicts the "official" account
One way of doing that is to talk about some other work you don't like by some expert to show that he cannot be trusted on this subject.
Prepare your defence
If someone highlights a gap or inconsistency in your evidence, don't be afraid to tweak your story, but keep the core conspiracy in place
You can allow the finer details of the theory to mutate, but always keep in mind the maxim - "they did it, I just have to find the proof that they did it"
The above also and particularly applies to True Believers. They KNOW the truth. They just have to find "the proof" which MUST be out there somewhere.
Broaden the circle of conspirators to include those who question your position... "they're denying the truth - they must be involved too!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.