Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnalogReigns
Still, considering all the un-Christian functional-atheist types who wear little crosses as jewelry, I can’t get all excited and shout “Persecution!” when all jewelry is excluded—even if certain clothing endemic to other religions is allowed.

So, certain religions should get preferential treatment because the symbol of another religion is abused? Sorry, not buying it.

5 posted on 06/28/2007 9:41:51 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Conviction and righteousness are force multipliers.--Freeper bert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback

> So, certain religions should get preferential treatment because the symbol of another religion is abused? Sorry, not buying it.

Amen. The day will come perhaps when some Government hack will try to forbid me from wearing my wedding ring because it symbolizes something deep and meaningful and increasingly no longer in fashion. They are welcome to it if they can take it off me, dead or alive.


6 posted on 06/28/2007 10:37:10 PM PDT by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson