Is that ok with you?
I think you meant 2036 for the other guy...but I agree! :-)
senator@biden.senate.gov; senator@chambliss.senate.gov; senator@durbin.senate.gov; senator@harkin.senate.gov; senator@mcconnell.senate.gov; senator@kerry.senate.gov; senator@levin.senate.gov; senator@hagel.senate.gov; senator@lautenberg.senate.gov; senator@reed.senate.gov; senator@graham.senate.gov; senator@dodd.senate.gov; senator@lieberman.senate.gov; senator@whitehouse.senate.gov; ssenator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov; senator@carper.senate.gov; ssenator@cardin.senate.gov; senator@mikulski.senate.gov; senator@menendez.senate.gov; senator@clinton.senate.gov; senator@obama.senate.gov; senator@schumer.senate.gov; senator@casey.senate.gov; senator@specter.senate.gov; senator@lincoln.senate.gov; senator@martinez.senate.gov; senator@nelson.senate.gov; senator@bayh.senate.gov; senator_lugar@lugar.senate.gov; senator@stabenow.senate.gov; senator@brown.senate.gov; senator@voinivich.senate.gov; senator@feingold.senate.gov; senator@kohl.senate.gov; senator@salazar.senate.gov; senator@klobucher.senate.gov; senator@conrad.senate.gov; senator@mccain.senate.gov; senator@feinstein.senate.gov; senator@wyden.senate.gov; senator@cantwell.senate.gov; senator@murray.senate.gov; senator@akaka.senate.gov; senator@inouye.senate.gov; senator@Alexander.senate.gov; senator@Allard.senate.gov; senator@Baucus.senate.gov; senator@Bennett.senate.gov; senator@Bingaman.senate.gov; senator@Bond.senate.gov; senator@Boxer.senate.gov; senator@Bunning.senate.gov; senator@Burr.senate.gov; senator@Byrd.senate.gov; senator@Chambliss.senate.gov; senator@Cochran.senate.gov; senator@Coleman.senate.gov; senator@Collins.senate.gov; senator@Corker.senate.gov; senator@Cornyn.senate.gov; senator@Craig.senate.gov; senator@Crapo.senate.gov; senator@DeMint.senate.gov; senator@Dole.senate.gov; senator@Domenici.senate.gov; senator@Dorgan.senate.gov; senator@Ensign.senate.gov; senator@Grassley.senate.gov; senator@Gregg.senate.gov; senator@Hatch.senate.gov; senator@Hutchison.senate.gov; senator@Inhofe.senate.gov; senator@Isakson.senate.gov; senator@Kyl.senate.gov; senator@Landrieu.senate.gov; senator@Lott.senate.gov; senator@McCaskill.senate.gov; senator@McConnell.senate.gov; senator@Murkowski.senate.gov; senator@Pryor.senate.gov; senator@Roberts.senate.gov; senator@Rockefeller.senate.gov; senator@Sanders.senate.gov; senator@Sessions.senate.gov; senator@Shelby.senate.gov; senator@Smith.senate.gov; senator@Snowe.senate.gov; senator@Stevens.senate.gov; senator@Sununu.senate.gov; senator@Tester.senate.gov; senator@Thune.senate.gov; senator@Vitter.senate.gov; senator@Warner.senate.gov; senator@Webb.senate.gov; senator@Brownback.senate.gov; senator@Coburn.senate.gov; senator@Enzi.senate.gov; senator@Johnson.senate.gov
Subject: Progress On Securing The Border??
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:17 am
Dear Senators,
Since S.1639 has been defeated, will the fence, vehicle barriers, and camera towers, previously approved, continue to be built??
As I understand it, only 2 miles, out of the 370 miles of fence previously appproved, have been built so far. If my memory is correct, 200 miles of vehicle barriers, and 70 camera towers, have also been previously approved.
Perhaps the administration, and the Senate, should heed the desires of the American people, and put these things on the front burner, and make sure they get funded, and built.
Could you please inform the American public as to the status of the above, and what the construction schedule might be. As you can probably tell by our response to the Immigration Bill, we really are concerned, and we do want to know.
Thank You.
Sincerely,