Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom Dignity n Honor

I don’t agree, and I don’t think that is meaningful, mosty because one person can be in so many different income groups in the course of his lifetime. There are also some people who earn respect in other ways while there are others who have a lot of money and no rank. More importantly, there is no system for allocating or recognizing rank. Listen to the questions when pols talk about taxing the rich. First question is what do they mean?


228 posted on 06/28/2007 10:05:41 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]


To: ClaireSolt
It doesn't matter if you agree or not. This is what is being taught in Sociology classes in university.

The term you are looking for when a person who has alot of respect, such as honor and prestige excluding money is "social status". Preachers and teachers can fit into this category. "Social class" is based on "wealth, the power one receives with that wealth and the life chances that one has to accumulate wealth. Socio-economic status is a concept to assess status, depending on a person's income, education, and occupation (Understanding Sociology)."

We also have other terms, white collar worker and blue collar worker come to mind.

I'd say there is a system in place for recognizing rank and status.

229 posted on 06/28/2007 10:30:09 AM PDT by Freedom Dignity n Honor (There are permanent moral truths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson