Incendiary rounds aren’t illegal... at least not in the majority of states around the Union. Most people don’t even have a clue about what they really are or what they were designed for... Obviously the twit that proposed this legislation is one of them.
NYC has a few Barrett rifles for defense against terrorists. This brings up 2 points...
1. If NYC needs them, then the people do too.
2. NYC knows that if the .50’s are banned, Ronnie Barrett will do to them what he did to California and they don’t want that.
Mike
I can't understand why people give anti-gunners the benefit of the doubt (if she just understood it she wouldn't be this way)
I have a different perspective. This woman understands exacty the capabilities and limitations of the hardware. She isn't ignorant, but evil and is deliberately lying to further an anti-gun agenda. Anti-gunners just want "reasonable" restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms. Ignoring the fact that restrictions on a right make it pass into the realm of privilege rather than right, the anti-gunners "reasonable" restrictions are complete citizen disarmament, with all firearms ONLY in the hands of the police and the military. This is what is "reasonable" to them.
Gun control is not a reasoned position to them, it is a religion, and they're as fanatical about making us helpless as Osama bin Laden is about killing us. The cannot be reasoned with. They cannot be persuaded by facts. They have no mercy or sympathy for the fact that we want to defend ourselves and our families from harm. They will never stop nor will they ever be satisfed with less than their final solution. Every new restriciton is a "good first step."
This will only end one of three ways