Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AzaleaCity5691

Funny how the same folks that sometimes say you cannot always interpret the Bible literally, somehow want to take that one verse (somewhat out of context) and interpret it with a very narrow and literal interpretation.

Some would prefer interpret that verse as something more along the lines of the “Church” will be founded on men “like Peter” who are strong spritually, endowed with leadership and faith of “a rock”. This also is reflected in the semi-autonomous nature of the early Church still reflected in the Bible, especially shown in the Apostle Paul’s writings.

An in-depth study of early church history, from the Apostolic age through the last century is fascinating - and eye-opening.

Then again, I don’t recall the term “Pope” or “Pontiff” being used by Jesus Christ either... (now to duck-and-cover)...


23 posted on 06/24/2007 9:12:43 PM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: TheBattman
An in-depth study of early church history, from the Apostolic age through the last century is fascinating - and eye-opening.

Aye, that it is.

As the English scholar and convert John Henry (Cardinal) Newman put it, "To be deep in history is to cease to be a Protestant."

25 posted on 06/24/2007 9:31:56 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: TheBattman
Christ didn't use the Bible either as it didn't exist at the time and much of what He said and did isn't recorded in written form, just as Scripture teaches.

Three other words you won't find in Scripture: Bible, Incarnation and Trinity.

37 posted on 06/25/2007 2:18:28 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson