If Borger or any of the other ID scientists won the Nobel, given the current climate, I would be extremely suspicious. So hopefully, Borger et al won’t win the politically/compromise-driven Nobel any time soon. However, there have been a number of Nobel prize winners who didn’t let on to the fact that they were ID proponents until after they won the prize. And to those scientists I say: For those who are about to DESTROY the Church of Darwin, we salute you!
Your Borger guy mentions Darwin at the front of his piece. Intelligent scientists who are trying to take down widely accepted ideas would not begin their revolution by such a direct attack.
There are genuine scientists that, for example, dispute the expanding universe concept that's been generally accepted. But they don't state up front that they're goal is to destroy all the science that's based on an expanding universe. Instead, they speak directly at whatever piece of detail in the science that they can get a handle on, and allow other scientists to make their own conclusions that perhaps this new data overturns the existing paradigm.
Your guy Borger obviously isn't seriously interested in persuading the scientific community. He's writing for people outside of science, like you, who are numerous and will support him one way or another because it backs up your religious faith. He's free to do so, but don't pretend that he's doing real science. Those who attempt to bring ideas such as Borgers into science class are perpetuating fraud, because it's outside of science.
Take your ideas to philosophy class, or religion class, but attempting to hijack science via the Wedge Conspiracy, or the way the leftists have partially succeeded via their Gaia environmental movement should not be tolerated by anyone concerned with the integrity of science.
Thankfully, there is a nearly unanimous rejection of your religious based creation science, and probably a majority of science that rejects the global warming crap, even though it's not portrayed that way in the media. Both creation science and enviromentalism are outside agendas that have attached themselves to science in an attempt to gain credibility. In the end, they will both fail.