Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/21/2007 7:37:29 AM PDT by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: SShultz460

“Submariners say there are only 2 types of ships: submarines and targets”

Wow - aint that something to ponder.


2 posted on 06/21/2007 7:39:33 AM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Doohickey; judicial meanz; submarinerswife; PogySailor; chasio649; gobucks; Bottom_Gun; Dog Gone; ..
Submariners say there are only 2 types of ships: submarines and targets. . . .

One Ping Only!

3 posted on 06/21/2007 7:40:52 AM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460

So far as I know, new destroyers may be slower than WW2 counterparts. I believe Fletcher Class DDs were capable of speeds as high as 35 to 38 knots. I am correct on that?

I love aircraft carriers, but if they are attacked by waves of cruise missiles launched from a long way out, how would one evade and survive?

Interesting post, thanks.


5 posted on 06/21/2007 7:42:43 AM PDT by RexBeach (Americans never quit. -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460
Submarines are good. Submarines are grand. But,

They make terrible aircraft carriers, and.

A single technological breakthrough that ‘renders the sea transparent’ puts the entire fleet at risk.

7 posted on 06/21/2007 7:44:08 AM PDT by null and void (Tired of living in the shadows? Move to Sunny Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460
Well, if the only function a navy has is controlling the seas, this submarines are the way to go. If you want to control the air over the oceans, or project power ashore you need surface vessels.

I think Mr. Burleson’s vision of what a navy is for seems pretty one-dimensional.

12 posted on 06/21/2007 7:46:28 AM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460

Very interesting. Thanks for posting.


14 posted on 06/21/2007 7:46:48 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460
This guy is a retard poser.

I'd like to see ANY fleet in the world...or combined fleet...challenge a combined US Carrier task force at sea.

While there may be some risk in coastal waters, noting can compete with a full battle group. They bring subs for sub-surface protection...and the aircover makes all the difference.

If you want the ability to P R O J E C T power, there's no substitute.

19 posted on 06/21/2007 7:50:21 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460
This sounds a lot like the talk that I heard in the late eighties early nineties.

Why do we still have Infantry? With all the fire power that a modern air force can bring to the battlefield, with waves and waves of missiles and bombers etc ... isn’t spending thousands of dollars per Infantryman a bit extravagant?

Then a real war came along....

23 posted on 06/21/2007 7:50:55 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460

Chicks allowed on Subs?


24 posted on 06/21/2007 7:51:48 AM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460
For some reason, that old saw about eggs and one basket comes to mind.
25 posted on 06/21/2007 7:52:28 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460
SONOBUOY PING!

Not the usual fare for a Sonobuoy ping, but I thought there may be a few who would like to weigh in on the discussion.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium volume pinglist.

27 posted on 06/21/2007 7:53:19 AM PDT by magslinger (Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors. And miss. R.A.Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460
Some Russian-built boats come equipped with anti-aircraft missiles which makes this standard ASW tactic suicidal.

That's a myth. There is no way for a submarine to use such a missile without giving itself away, and that kind of defeats the purpose of the submarine in the first place.

32 posted on 06/21/2007 7:55:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460

Sneak a few of these babies into the Caspian Sea ;o)


33 posted on 06/21/2007 7:56:14 AM PDT by blasater1960 (Rehavam Zeevi- HaShem Yikom Damo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TommyDale

flag


34 posted on 06/21/2007 7:57:54 AM PDT by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460

Can’t wait to see the submersible aircraft that go with them.


35 posted on 06/21/2007 7:58:03 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460

A well defended carrier group is pretty formidable. Subs are part of that group.


39 posted on 06/21/2007 8:04:48 AM PDT by llevrok (I voted for George Bush - not Jorge Bushjoles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460
as occurred when a Chinese SONG class stalked the USS KITTY HAWK last year,

I stopped reading after this nonsense.

42 posted on 06/21/2007 8:12:17 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460

Subs can’t support ground troops, or launch aircraft that can.


46 posted on 06/21/2007 8:21:12 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460
I am of the opinion that in full-scale shooting war at sea

The assertion is meaningless. This opinion may be a leftover of a bad dream, perhaps inspired by a bite of potato salad left out in the sun too long at the office picnic.

58 posted on 06/21/2007 8:40:00 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SShultz460

Methinks Mr Burleson just received his dolphins, or is an armchair admiral playing too much “Harpoon”.


62 posted on 06/21/2007 8:50:26 AM PDT by Shellback Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson