In a sense I think you're right when you make these statements; I would, however, not label various views of origins or theories of life's genesis as all suitable to the adjective "Creationist".
I commend you for stating the real debate question over again, and so simply: How this world and universe originated, and just what was the genesis of all that is, these are the questions of debate. I personally think the thread would prove more useful and stimulating if debaters actually exchanged viewpoints and evidence on this point. Other arguments really are turning out to be waste-of-bandwidth rabbit trails - circular, aimless wanderings, slingshot stones, wounded bunnies...but no meat to chew on come dinner time!
Thanks, hosepipe.
To restate:
How did life/the universe/everything originate?
What evidence do you have to support your position?
In what ways does your position influence your every observation,
and, conversely, in what ways do your observations influence your position?
Eww. Very poor grammar. Sorry everyone.
True especially since "What is life?.." has not been determined yet, BY ANYBODY I know of..
What IS life?.. of a microbe?, carrot?, a dog?, an Ape, a man?
Is LIFE spiritual? Are there various qualitys/levels/kinds of spirit?..