To: metmom; Stultis; Alamo-Girl; tacticalogic; hosepipe
Maybe all Islamists are creationists, but so what? Are all creationists Islamists? metmom, you say it better than I did (at #151 below).
Perhaps Stultis does not see the distinction being raised....
Thank you so much!
369 posted on
06/25/2007 5:50:12 PM PDT by
betty boop
("Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -- A. Einstein)
To: metmom
RE: that post #151 reference. Sorry...another thread I guess. I’ve been “busy” today.... :^)
379 posted on
06/25/2007 6:21:47 PM PDT by
betty boop
("Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -- A. Einstein)
To: betty boop; metmom
Maybe all Islamists are creationists, but so what? Are all creationists Islamists? metmom, you say it better than I did (at #151 below).
Perhaps Stultis does not see the distinction being raised....
A trivial fallacy (not even a modal fallacy) of formal logic (I guess this would be a form of converting or reversing conditionals) that most college students learn in their freshman year is some great, subtle "distinction"? Puh-leeeeze.
I think my previous response on this to metmom...
Well, DUH!
...stands.
389 posted on
06/25/2007 7:09:17 PM PDT by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson