Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
Creationists have no basis on which to determine fraud (such as Piltdown) and no methodology by which to test theories for error.

Sure they do. The same thing scientists use. It's called *science*.

Science is more than sidetracked by fraud and petty tyrants. It's replete with them. Of course, it matters, because it ruins it, wastes time, and casts a pall on the credibility of those who are doing science with integrity.

340 posted on 06/25/2007 2:53:13 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
Sure they do. The same thing scientists use. It's called *science*.

If the methodology assumes unchanging laws of nature, it is science, but then it departs from creationism.

Creationism assumes that any phenomenon could be the result of divine intervention. This is the defining difference between the two modes of thinking.Within recorded history, everything from the flight of an arrow through plagues, earthquakes and volcanoes, has been attributed to the action of divinities.

Starting from this assumption, it is impossible to discuss the past in any terms that imply unchanging laws.

345 posted on 06/25/2007 3:14:32 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson