[Alamo-Girl]

It's kind of interesting that you associate the practice of "muddling words" as being more or less exclusive to the evolutionists.

LOLOL! I'm a veteran of the crevo wars.

Neither side has clean hands, but the evolutionists are like sharks going into a feeding frenzy when they smell "blood in the water" over word usage.

And they are seldom happy when we throw word usage back at them, e.g. randomness v unpredictability, combinatorics v Bayesian probability, and so on.

[tacticalogic]

I guess the test of objectivity is whether you leave the debate wearing spit wads on both sides.

[tacticalogic]

Neither side has clean hands, but the evolutionists are like sharks going into a feeding frenzy when they smell "blood in the water" over word usage.

And they are seldom happy when we throw word usage back at them, e.g. randomness v unpredictability, combinatorics v Bayesian probability, and so on.

As long as it remains "us vs them" it's going to be a adversarial proposition.

[Stultis]

but the evolutionists are like sharks going into a feeding frenzy when they smell "blood in the water" over word usage

Sorry if I seem upset. I'm not really. It's not even frustration. It's more a kind of amazed incredulity that there's actually an argument that's gone on message after message as to whether "Islamists" are "creationists". If I'm frustrated it's more with the incredible stupidity of the argument itself than any particular person. Maybe (probably) I'm the stupid one for still being in such a silly argument!