If you really care about the unalienable right to life, there are only two of these candidates who are acceptable: Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo.
If you make the judgment that they can't win because of whatever factor, a very subjective and most often self-fulfilling exercise, then we better hope that someone gets in who gets it, and who has what it takes to win.
Otherwise, at best we're going to get the status quo. And that's unacceptable when you consider that 3 to 4 thousand babies continue to die every day.
Then let’s get back to what I said before. What are Hunter and Tancredo doing to raise money to get themselves elected? Either of them should have started last year using the same model that Howard Dean used in 2004 to create a huge grassroots support and financial base; however, neither Hunter nor Tancredo has done this.
I haven’t made any judgment that they “can’t win,” but I am making an observation that they really don’t seem to be doing what is necessary to win.