I dont give a crap about "evolution." What I DO care about is the utterly nonsensical, idiotic, and stupid preening of empiricists who prate emptyheadedness about "you have faith and I have proof." I happen to be a serious evangelical who is also a measured fan of Penn and Teller in that I believe in calling bullshit by its name.
"Evolution" threads gives simplistic fundies to show off their wares and correspondingly gives fatuous arguments by empiricists a chance to display their own brand of the same idiocy. While vicious attacks (like this) are no subsitute for reasoned arguments, now you know my opinion. I will, I promise, try to back it up online for you over the weekend. Fair 'nough?
You had an opportunity to engage in a discussion of empiricism and methodological naturalism back at post 940.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1851882/posts?page=540#540
Science does not engage in truth finding or proofs. It does engage in acquiring reliable knowledge. Since I know most of the people here who argue for evolution, and I know that they spend a lot of time refuting the charge that science “proves” things, I expect you to find a counterexample or withdraw your claim that we prate about having proof.