Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you wish to join, please be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you wish to join, please be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
IMHO, the way to handle our litigious nature as a country is to tax the living crap out of the winnings in court cases. This way, we discourage the behavior, but if someone is really in the wrong, the wronged can get proper justice.
That’s an interesting perspective that isn’t often espoused by Republicans.
Some level of punitive damages is also reasonable, on the principle that it’s not enough merely to force a thief to give back the amount of money which was stolen if the thief happens to get caught and convicted. There should be an additional penalty for the harm caused so as to discourage such acts.
But the enormous punitive damages allowed by our tort system go far beyond such objectives. The tort system has developed into a lottery system where litigants (and attorneys who receive a big percentage as contingency fees) can make incredible fortunes if they convinced a sympathetic jury to sock it to the defendant.
Not only should punitive damages be limited, but a “loser pays” system should require unsuccessful litigants to pay the costs and attorney’s fees of the defendant. That’s the way to discourage frivolous lawsuits and to compensate winning defendants for the huge toll which defending an unjust lawsuit imposes on them.
When some states and localities offer favorable climates for unjust lawsuits against nationwide corporations or individuals from other states, it is squarely within the federal government’s legitimate “interstate commerce” powers to place limits on those lawsuits.
I’m content to let the Republicans duke it out and see who’s standing when the smoke clears. I’m impressed by the crop of Republican candidates. I like Guiliani more than I did because he’s very articulate and persuasive which is a good quality in a president. The only problem with him is his record on abortion but he does say he will appoint strict constructionists to the court. He did wear a dress to a Halloween party though and that is a bit worrisome as far a propaganda material here and around the world. Romney is very impressive as a businessman and as a speaker but how is he really when he has to go to the mat in a heated debate or when he has to sound more sincere to connect with the American people? Thompson may have a the good qualities we need and obviously he is a master strategist by polling high and not joining the race. He speaks with common sense and wisdom and patriotism which is something I admire in him. But I am going to have to see more of Fred under pressure to make my decision.
There are lots of aspects in tort reform besides capping damages. Stopping frivolous lawsuits and jury shopping, just to name a couple. Still, GWB ran in support of Tort Reform, and you see how that worked out... I don’t think this is very high on any politician’s radar.
I love the writers use of “Republican Bluebloods”. It has a nicer ring than “democRAT”. Of course when the democRATS ask these bluebloods for campaign funds, the bluebloods are friends?
Oh for the LOVE !!!
This is 10000% against the planks in our party platform! We ARE for tort reform. Pushing Fred as a NOBLE Trial Lawyer is nothing but spin. Why can’t he be honest about that ??
That sure ain't no badge of honor. Bleh.